From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kent Overstreet Subject: Re: Bcache upstreaming Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 09:01:03 -0800 Message-ID: <20130131170103.GT26407@google.com> References: <20130104235040.GA26407@google.com> <20130110175954.GR26407@google.com> <20130114223722.GZ26407@google.com> <20130114225330.GA1365@redhat.com> <20130117022728.GA16148@redhat.com> <20130117114104.GJ10411@moria.home.lan> <20130130233643.GD12631@moria.home.lan> <20130131165223.GB11894@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130131165223.GB11894-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-bcache-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Mike Snitzer Cc: linux-bcache-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, device-mapper development List-Id: dm-devel.ids On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 11:52:23AM -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote: > On Wed, Jan 30 2013 at 6:36pm -0500, > Kent Overstreet wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 03:41:04AM -0800, Kent Overstreet wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 09:27:28PM -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jan 14 2013 at 5:53pm -0500, > > > > Mike Snitzer wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 14 2013 at 5:37pm -0500, > > > > > Kent Overstreet wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Want to try again with the latest bcache-for-upstream branch? I fixed > > > > > > all that sysfs stuff, but I wasn't seeing the original build error so > > > > > > I'd appreciate if you verify I did in fact fix that issue. > > > > > > > > > > Will do, thanks Kent. > > > > > > > > I hit the crash below if I do this in a script: > > > > > > > > echo 1 > /sys/block/bcache0/bcache/cache/unregister > > > > echo 1 > /sys/block/bcache0/bcache/stop > > > > > > Thanks - I reproduced it, trying to figure out the sanest way to fix it. > > > This is not the prettiest area of the code :P > > > > And, I finally have a fix for it up. > > > > Fixed a bunch of other bugs today too... > > Hey Kent, > > Which branch did you push your latest fixes to? I cannot seem to find > them. They're in the master bcache branch (also -dev and -testing)