From: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
To: Chris Murphy <lists@colorremedies.com>
Cc: Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor@nexgo.de>,
linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Huge values of mismatch_cnt on RAID 6 arrays under Fedora 18
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 21:05:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130131200547.63ABB200276@gemini.denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1C562BB9-9FD8-482C-BE3E-E52A027A5C88@colorremedies.com>
Dear Chris,
In message <1C562BB9-9FD8-482C-BE3E-E52A027A5C88@colorremedies.com> you wrote:
>
> > I cannot test the exact old kernel I was running before any more;
> > Fedora has released an update in the meantime, and they do not keep
> > older updates around
>
> They are in koji.
Ah! Do you have any pointer for me how to access stuff there?
> > With the current Fedora kernel, the first check will report errors
> > which do not go away permanently, not even with a "repair".
>
> This is 3.7.4-204?
Correct.
> Hypothetically this should be reproducible by anyone using that kernel, by creating a new raid6, running repair, and then running check and confirming thee mismatch count is non-zero.
Actually just running check should be sufficient - that was how I
discovered the issue: I received warning mails from the "raid-check"
cron job.
> > I did this, actually in parallel with reporting the issues here:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=904831
>
> I defer to others but I'm not sure if the component is mdadm or if it's kernel, in this case. You've only changed kernels from 3.7.4-204 to 3.8-rc5, not mdadm.
True. That was not clear to me initially, so I was looking for
"something RAID6 related". Fixed now - thanks for pointing out.
> > I think the relevant Fedora people are on Cc:, but there was zero
> > response so far; seems potential data loss is of no concern to the
> > Fedora project :-(
>
> It's not atypical for there to be delays in responding to such things when it's not widespread, and as yet no one else has reproduced it even on this list.
This is what surprises me most. I would have expected at least some
"me too!" by now...
> So we need reproducers, and they need to comment on the bug. Also a step by step to reproduce the bug is important, to help get people to try to reproduce it.
For me it is sufficient to:
- boot the 3.7.4-204
- bring up the array
- run "check"
It comes up with mismatch_cnt=0 after boot, and some huge number while
/ after the check.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd@denx.de
Die Freiheit des Menschen liegt nicht darin, dass er tun kann, was er
will, sondern darin, dass er nicht tun muss, was er nicht will.
-- Jean-Jacques Rousseau
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-31 20:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-27 19:26 Huge values of mismatch_cnt on RAID 6 arrays under Fedora 18 Wolfgang Denk
2013-01-27 19:45 ` Chris Murphy
2013-01-27 23:10 ` Wolfgang Denk
2013-01-27 20:05 ` Robin Hill
2013-01-27 23:11 ` Wolfgang Denk
2013-01-28 1:14 ` Phil Turmel
2013-01-28 1:42 ` Chris Murphy
2013-01-28 2:16 ` Chris Murphy
2013-01-28 6:43 ` Wolfgang Denk
2013-01-28 6:36 ` Wolfgang Denk
2013-01-28 7:00 ` Chris Murphy
2013-01-28 10:27 ` Wolfgang Denk
2013-01-28 6:27 ` Wolfgang Denk
2013-01-28 2:07 ` Brad Campbell
2013-01-28 6:39 ` Wolfgang Denk
2013-01-28 7:58 ` Dan Williams
2013-01-28 17:37 ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2013-01-28 18:12 ` Chris Murphy
2013-01-28 19:00 ` Wolfgang Denk
2013-01-28 19:10 ` Wolfgang Denk
2013-01-28 19:22 ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2013-01-28 20:19 ` Wolfgang Denk
2013-01-28 20:44 ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2013-01-28 22:47 ` Chris Murphy
2013-01-28 22:49 ` Chris Murphy
2013-01-28 23:03 ` Wolfgang Denk
2013-01-28 23:13 ` Chris Murphy
2013-01-28 23:31 ` Wolfgang Denk
2013-01-28 22:59 ` Wolfgang Denk
2013-01-28 23:07 ` Chris Murphy
2013-01-28 23:23 ` Wolfgang Denk
2013-01-28 23:42 ` Chris Murphy
2013-01-29 18:02 ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2013-01-29 18:28 ` Wolfgang Denk
2013-01-29 18:43 ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2013-01-29 17:49 ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2013-01-29 19:35 ` Paul Menzel
2013-01-29 20:18 ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2013-01-28 23:18 ` Wolfgang Denk
2013-01-29 17:57 ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2013-01-29 18:43 ` Wolfgang Denk
2013-01-29 20:24 ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2013-01-31 12:12 ` Wolfgang Denk
2013-01-31 17:14 ` Chris Murphy
2013-01-31 17:51 ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2013-01-31 18:36 ` Wolfgang Denk
2013-01-31 19:35 ` Chris Murphy
2013-01-31 19:46 ` Chris Murphy
2013-01-31 20:05 ` Wolfgang Denk [this message]
2013-01-31 20:41 ` Chris Murphy
2013-01-31 17:47 ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2013-01-28 19:18 ` Piergiorgio Sartor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130131200547.63ABB200276@gemini.denx.de \
--to=wd@denx.de \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lists@colorremedies.com \
--cc=piergiorgio.sartor@nexgo.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.