From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: gmbnomis@gmail.com (Simon Baatz)
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 23:26:16 +0100
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] ARM: kirkwood: Ensure that
 kirkwood_ge0[01]_init() finds its clock
In-Reply-To: <20130131003222.GX7717@titan.lakedaemon.net>
References: <20130129004824.GB7717@titan.lakedaemon.net>
 <20130129194243.GA30831@schnuecks.de> <51082C4E.5050903@gmail.com>
 <20130130000341.GA10600@schnuecks.de> <51086E86.8040705@gmail.com>
 <20130130083044.GA25688@schnuecks.de> <5108F300.7000705@gmail.com>
 <20130130230100.GV7717@titan.lakedaemon.net>
 <5109AB30.5020202@gmail.com>
 <20130131003222.GX7717@titan.lakedaemon.net>
Message-ID: <20130131222615.GA17976@schnuecks.de>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Hi Jason,

On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 07:32:22PM -0500, Jason Cooper wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 12:22:24AM +0100, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> > On 01/31/2013 12:01 AM, Jason Cooper wrote:
> > >As it stands, there are three patches to fix this issue:
> > >
> > >ARM: kirkwood: of_serial: fix clock gating by removing clock-frequency
> > >ARM: kirkwood: provide ge clock aliases for shared smi
> > >ARM: kirkwood: fix to retain gbe MAC addresses for DT kernels
> > 
> > Actually, for the second patch I got distracted by the smi split patch
> > set floating around. But that is not in current kernel and smi will not
> > request any clock at all.
> > 
> > If Simon can hit another round of testing without second patch included
> > and agrees, I suggest to keep it for next release.
> 
> Ok, I'll wait for Simon on this.  fixes can go anytime, so no rush.
> Better to get it right the first (second?) time out.

Ok, will do. For the first patch you already have my Tested-by. 
Sebastian is right on the second one, it does not add value for 3.8
yet.  I will test the third patch as soon as I find time.
 
- Simon