From: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lkp@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: aim7 performance regression by commit 5a50508 report from LKP
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 18:53:13 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130201105313.GA22784@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130131112252.GB4587@gmail.com>
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 12:22:52PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> > > or whether the lock hold times could be reduced drastically
> >
> > I also found one, but it doesn't sound like the one will
> > reduce lock hold times drastically:
> >
> > vma_lock_anon_vma() seems covered too much code at
> > expand_up/downwards.
> >
> > Well, again, it's quite a tiny optimization for reducing the
> > coverage.
>
> The fundamental problem is I think that there's a single anon
> vma lock for the whole workload, right?
Yes.
>
> Is that really fundamentally needed, could that be spread out
> perhaps?
I'm digging into this.
Thanks.
--yliu
>
> ( But first we want to see how much of the regression we can fix
> in an equivalent-locking-patterns fashion - improving locking
> is a separate matter. )
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ingo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-01 10:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-29 8:25 aim7 performance regression by commit 5a50508 report from LKP Yuanhan Liu
2013-01-29 8:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-01-29 9:06 ` Yuanhan Liu
2013-01-29 9:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-01-30 9:34 ` Yuanhan Liu
2013-01-31 11:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-02-01 10:53 ` Yuanhan Liu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130201105313.GA22784@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com \
--to=yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.