From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jochen Heuer <jogi-intel-gfx@planetzork.ping.de>
Subject: Re: Advanced Deinterlacers
Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2013 15:37:45 +0100
Message-ID: <20130203143745.GA8533@planetzork.ping.de>
References: <510B6C6F.5010209@arcor.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org>
Received: from lilly.ping.de (lilly.ping.de [83.97.42.2])
	by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 99200E5C8A
	for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>;
	Sun,  3 Feb 2013 06:45:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from planetzork.ping.de by lilly.ping.de with BSMTP (rgsmtp-qm-ot
	0.6) for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>; 3 Feb 2013 14:39:10 -0000
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <510B6C6F.5010209@arcor.de>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx>
List-Post: <mailto:intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
To: Mario Schulz <tf5a@arcor.de>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org

Hello,

> As far as I have seen you have successfully implementeted the API
> technology to select interlacers in the video pipeline as video
> postprocessor since middle of last year.
> 
> The VDR community is still waiting for MotionAdaptive or MotionCompensated.
> 
> Could you comment on your schedule for that?
> - Is it for some reason technologically impossible to get it implemented?
> - Are the plans for IVB or SBR to make it available?

I am very interested in this also since I probably have to replace my old VDR
in the near future and I need to know if I have to go the NVidia route because
of working VDPAU support for advanced deinterlacers (although I would not like
it since it's closed source) or if I can expect working advanced deinterlacers
in the near future in the Intel stack. Because I would prefer to go the Intel
route instead.

Thanks and best regards,

   Jogi