From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
To: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
linux-sh@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] spi: bitbang: convert to using core message queue
Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 17:22:10 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130205172210.299433E1587@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1301101304210.24058@axis700.grange>
On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 13:04:37 +0100 (CET), Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de> wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Jan 2013, Linus Walleij wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Guennadi Liakhovetski
> > <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de> wrote:
> >
> > > [ 79.968000] mmc0: new SD card on SPI
> > > [ 79.976000] mmcblk0: mmc0:0000 SU02G 1.84 GiB
> > > [ 80.024000] mmcblk0: p1
> > > [ 80.132000] mmcblk0: error -38 sending status command, retrying
> > > [ 80.136000] mmcblk0: error -38 sending status command, retrying
> > > [ 80.140000] mmcblk0: error -38 sending status command, aborting
> > > [ 81.028000] mmc0: SPI card removed
> > > [ 81.572000] mmc0: error -110 whilst initialising SD card
> >
> > The queue mechanism has not changed.
> >
> > This *could* be the card itself. So it doesn't appear before the patch?
>
> No.
It could merely be a result of timing changes by using the core message
queue. I'll leave the patch for now until someone can properly
investigate.
g.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-05 17:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-09 14:08 [PATCH v2 1/2] spi: bitbang: simplify pointer arithmetics Guennadi Liakhovetski
2013-01-09 14:08 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2013-01-09 14:08 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] spi: bitbang: convert to using core message queue Guennadi Liakhovetski
2013-01-09 14:08 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2013-01-09 14:44 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2013-01-09 14:44 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2013-01-10 11:59 ` Linus Walleij
2013-01-10 11:59 ` Linus Walleij
[not found] ` <CACRpkdbsbXTM47TYTjF9sJQaMRetTbHm0Xri-=2kWsdK14AYPw-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2013-01-10 12:04 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2013-01-10 12:04 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2013-02-05 17:22 ` Grant Likely [this message]
2013-07-17 14:33 ` [v2,2/2] " Uwe Kleine-König
2013-07-17 14:33 ` Uwe Kleine-König
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.64.1301091502020.13376-0199iw4Nj15frtckUFj5Ag@public.gmane.org>
2013-01-10 11:55 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] spi: bitbang: simplify pointer arithmetics Linus Walleij
2013-01-10 11:55 ` Linus Walleij
2013-01-10 12:04 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130205172210.299433E1587@localhost \
--to=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=g.liakhovetski@gmx.de \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
--cc=spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.