From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.171]:49476 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758026Ab3BFWFC (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Feb 2013 17:05:02 -0500 From: Arnd Bergmann To: Thomas Petazzoni Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 19/27] pci: PCIe driver for Marvell Armada 370/XP systems Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 22:04:19 +0000 Cc: Stephen Warren , Jason Gunthorpe , Lior Amsalem , Andrew Lunn , "Russell King - ARM Linux" , Jason Cooper , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Thierry Reding , "Eran Ben-Avi" , Nadav Haklai , Maen Suleiman , Shadi Ammouri , Gregory Clement , Tawfik Bayouk , Bjorn Helgaas , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org References: <20130130120344.GA29490@avionic-0098.mockup.avionic-design.de> <51129F6B.1050709@wwwdotorg.org> <20130206194222.27db0d90@skate> In-Reply-To: <20130206194222.27db0d90@skate> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Message-Id: <201302062204.19383.arnd@arndb.de> Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wednesday 06 February 2013, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > Can't we simply agree on having a first implementation that does the > simple thing, like the existing PCIe implementation for earlier Marvell > SoC families, and improve that if it happens to be needed, depending on > user feedback? Makes sense. I just looked up the kirkwood source to verify that the window is set up to map PCI IO address 0x10000-0x1ffff for the second bus to KIRKWOOD_PCIE1_IO_PHYS_BASE, which is mapped to logical port number 0x10000-0x1ffff (identity mapping). Arnd From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 22:04:19 +0000 Subject: [PATCH v2 19/27] pci: PCIe driver for Marvell Armada 370/XP systems In-Reply-To: <20130206194222.27db0d90@skate> References: <20130130120344.GA29490@avionic-0098.mockup.avionic-design.de> <51129F6B.1050709@wwwdotorg.org> <20130206194222.27db0d90@skate> Message-ID: <201302062204.19383.arnd@arndb.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wednesday 06 February 2013, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > Can't we simply agree on having a first implementation that does the > simple thing, like the existing PCIe implementation for earlier Marvell > SoC families, and improve that if it happens to be needed, depending on > user feedback? Makes sense. I just looked up the kirkwood source to verify that the window is set up to map PCI IO address 0x10000-0x1ffff for the second bus to KIRKWOOD_PCIE1_IO_PHYS_BASE, which is mapped to logical port number 0x10000-0x1ffff (identity mapping). Arnd