From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
To: Roland Scheidegger <rscheidegger_lists@hispeed.ch>
Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: terratec h5 rev. 3?
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013 13:17:42 -0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130208131742.32ab0750@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <510668E3.8060603@hispeed.ch>
Em Mon, 28 Jan 2013 13:02:43 +0100
Roland Scheidegger <rscheidegger_lists@hispeed.ch> escreveu:
> From: Roland Scheidegger <rscheidegger_lists@hispeed.ch>
> To: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: terratec h5 rev. 3?
> Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 13:02:43 +0100
> Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org
> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130105 Thunderbird/17.0.2
>
> Am 21.12.2012 06:38, schrieb linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've recently got a terratec h5 for dvb-c and thought it would be
> > supported but it looks like it's a newer revision not recognized by em28xx.
> > After using the new_id hack it gets recognized and using various htc
> > cards (notably h5 or cinergy htc stick, cards 79 and 82 respectively) it
> > seems to _nearly_ work but not quite (I was using h5 firmware for the
> > older version). Tuning, channel scan works however tv (or dvb radio)
> > does not, since it appears the error rate is going through the roof
> > (with some imagination it is possible to see some parts of the picture
> > sometimes and hear some audio pieces).
>
> Ok I have received a replacement now and I can confirm this stick in
> fact just works like the same as the older versions (I guess maybe the
> first one had bad solder point?). I can't judge signal sensitivity or
> anything like that (the snr values are rather humorous) but it's
> definitely good enough now with no reception issues. The IR receiver is
> another matter and I was unsuccesful in making it work for now (I guess
> noone got it working with the old versions neither as it lacks the ir
> entries).
> So could this card be added? I've added the trivial patch.
Could you please add your Signed-of-by: to the patch?
Thanks,
Mauro
>
> Roland
>
>
>
> [h5rev3.diff text/x-patch (549 bytes)]
--
Cheers,
Mauro
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-08 15:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-21 5:37 terratec h5 rev. 3? Roland Scheidegger
2012-12-22 21:25 ` Roland Scheidegger
2012-12-22 23:42 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2013-01-04 20:08 ` Philipp Dreimann
2013-01-28 12:02 ` Roland Scheidegger
2013-02-08 15:17 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab [this message]
2013-02-09 0:11 ` Roland Scheidegger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130208131742.32ab0750@redhat.com \
--to=mchehab@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rscheidegger_lists@hispeed.ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.