From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from arroyo.ext.ti.com (arroyo.ext.ti.com [192.94.94.40]) by arago-project.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94AB1529D3 for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 20:11:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dlelxv30.itg.ti.com ([172.17.2.17]) by arroyo.ext.ti.com (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id r1BKBV2p005923 for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 14:11:31 -0600 Received: from DFLE72.ent.ti.com (dfle72.ent.ti.com [128.247.5.109]) by dlelxv30.itg.ti.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r1BKBV4O029486 for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 14:11:31 -0600 Received: from dlelxv22.itg.ti.com (172.17.1.197) by dfle72.ent.ti.com (128.247.5.109) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.323.3; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 14:11:30 -0600 Received: from localhost ([158.218.102.158]) by dlelxv22.itg.ti.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r1BKBUdb023312; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 14:11:30 -0600 Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 15:11:30 -0500 From: Denys Dmytriyenko To: "Zhou, Jingting" Message-ID: <20130211201129.GC11440@edge> References: <3C08AEEB3C731745938BC83D029FE5E39179EE@DFLE09.ent.ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <3C08AEEB3C731745938BC83D029FE5E39179EE@DFLE09.ent.ti.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: "meta-arago@arago-project.org" Subject: Re: libdnet recipe for review? X-BeenThere: meta-arago@arago-project.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Arago metadata layer for TI SDKs - OE-Core/Yocto compatible List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 20:11:31 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 09:12:33PM +0000, Zhou, Jingting wrote: > Hey all, attached is the patch for review. I commented out the > > #FILES_${PN} += " ${libdir}/lib*.so" > > Because the arago is complaining > > ERROR: QA Issue: non -dev/-dbg/-nativesdk package contains symlink .so: > libdnet path > '/work/armv7a-vfp-neon-oe-linux-gnueabi/libdnet-1.12-r0/packages-split/libdnet/usr/lib/libdnet.so' Yes, the above line was not correct in the first place and I explained it to you numerous times - you want to package the actual libraries with the mask lib*.so.* into the main package, while putting symlinks lib*.so into the -dev package for the devkit... Now the framework is just more strict and won't allow you to do that, unless you force it. -- Denys