All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: chrubis@suse.cz
To: Bogdan Purcareata <bogdan.purcareata@gmail.com>
Cc: ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [LTP] Running LTP on embedded Busybox platforms
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 14:06:06 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130212130606.GC9378@rei> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAZGUZfwzVLPd6HesN26c4uL=ZTug9f-axrkcxHGRveqsjnjyA@mail.gmail.com>

Hi!
> I'm a new user of the LTP and I was wondering if it works on embedded
> platforms with custom Linux distros built with Yocto. I was interested
> in the "containers" set of tests, particularly the network namespace
> ones.

Most of the tests should work on embedded platforms and with Busybox but
I personaly can't guarante that. In other words We are trying not to
break things for anybody, but some tests may not worked from the start.

> I noticed the tests were not working properly on a Busybox
> system, and I've identified some differences between this and running
> LTP on my host Fedora 17 system (which works fine):
> - Busybox's diff outputs in the unified format by default - this
> causes parsing issues in LTP
> - there is no sshd server on my embedded platform - instead I have
> dropbear installed, and the scripts need minor changes to work
> - the networking utils - ping, ip, etc. - are from the inetutils
> package, instead if the expected iputils package

As usual patches are welcome.

> I was wondering if these requirements - diff, sshd, iputils package,
> and others - are somewhere listed as prerequisites in the
> documentation (I haven't searched it extensively). Where should I look
> for a complete list of host userspace applications needed by LTP to
> work?

Sorry the LTP documentation is not in a good shape. On the other hand I
would be happy to include what you have found into the containers README
file. Just send a signed patch.

> Also, are there any branches of the LTP project designed to work with
> e.g. Busybox by default? I noticed that the ltp-full-20130109.bz2
> arhive is universal and has no mentions of supported host distro
> configuration (or perhaps I didn't look in the right place?).

There are not. We have one archive to run on all flavors of Linux,
fragmentation would only make things worse.

-- 
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Free Next-Gen Firewall Hardware Offer
Buy your Sophos next-gen firewall before the end March 2013 
and get the hardware for free! Learn more.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sophos-d2d-feb
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

      reply	other threads:[~2013-02-12 13:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-02-12 11:31 [LTP] Running LTP on embedded Busybox platforms Bogdan Purcareata
2013-02-12 12:49 ` Bogdan Purcareata
2013-02-12 13:06   ` chrubis [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130212130606.GC9378@rei \
    --to=chrubis@suse.cz \
    --cc=bogdan.purcareata@gmail.com \
    --cc=ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.