From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965350Ab3BMXWi (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Feb 2013 18:22:38 -0500 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([78.46.96.112]:33179 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965136Ab3BMXWh (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Feb 2013 18:22:37 -0500 Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 00:22:28 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: Scan Subscription , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , David Woodhouse Subject: Re: New Defect(s) reported by Coverity Scan Message-ID: <20130213232228.GF18013@pd.tnic> Mail-Followup-To: Borislav Petkov , "H. Peter Anvin" , Scan Subscription , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , David Woodhouse References: <20130213183842.GC26948@pd.tnic> <20130213191352.GC18013@pd.tnic> <511C1E8E.5040106@zytor.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <511C1E8E.5040106@zytor.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 03:15:26PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Not really, since exit() does that. We might want it for clarity's > sake, though. Well, I would add a comment only then and teach the tool when parsing exit() to know that - no need for fixing perfectly good code only for a tool's sake. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine. --