All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Mandeep Singh Baines <msb@chromium.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] coredump: cleanup the waiting for coredump_finish code
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 15:30:59 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130215153059.8ac35241.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1360885096-21207-3-git-send-email-msb@chromium.org>

On Thu, 14 Feb 2013 15:38:14 -0800
Mandeep Singh Baines <msb@chromium.org> wrote:

> Replace the for loop with a simple if.

Well OK, but why?  Presumably the loop was added for a reason and
presumably you believe that reason to be (no longer?) correct.  Please
describe all these things.

> --- a/kernel/exit.c
> +++ b/kernel/exit.c
> @@ -479,12 +479,9 @@ static void exit_mm(struct task_struct * tsk)
>  		if (atomic_dec_and_test(&core_state->nr_threads))
>  			complete(&core_state->startup);
>  
> -		for (;;) {
> -			set_task_state(tsk, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
> -			if (!self.task) /* see coredump_finish() */
> -				break;
> +		set_task_state(tsk, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
> +		if (self.task) /* see coredump_finish() */
>  			schedule();
> -		}



  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-02-15 23:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-02-14 23:38 [PATCH 1/5] vfork: don't freezer_count() for in-kernel users of CLONE_VFORK Mandeep Singh Baines
2013-02-14 23:38 ` [PATCH 2/5] lockdep: check that no locks held at freeze time Mandeep Singh Baines
2013-02-15 11:16   ` Ingo Molnar
2013-02-15 15:44   ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-02-14 23:38 ` [PATCH 3/5] coredump: cleanup the waiting for coredump_finish code Mandeep Singh Baines
2013-02-15 14:53   ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-02-15 23:30   ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2013-02-14 23:38 ` [PATCH 4/5] coredump: use a freezable_schedule for the coredump_finish wait Mandeep Singh Baines
2013-02-14 23:38 ` [PATCH 5/5] coredump: abort core dump piping only due to a fatal signal Mandeep Singh Baines
2013-02-15 15:01   ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-02-16  1:20     ` Mandeep Singh Baines
2013-02-16 17:05       ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-02-15 23:25   ` Andrew Morton
2013-02-16  0:09   ` [PATCH v3] coredump: ignore non-fatal signals when core dumping to a pipe Mandeep Singh Baines
2013-02-16  0:57     ` [PATCH v4] " Mandeep Singh Baines
2013-02-15 15:28 ` [PATCH 1/5] vfork: don't freezer_count() for in-kernel users of CLONE_VFORK Oleg Nesterov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130215153059.8ac35241.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=msb@chromium.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.