All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Mark Lord <kernel@start.ca>
Cc: "Mark Lord" <kernel@teksavvy.com>,
	"Stanislav Kinsbursky" <skinsbursky@parallels.com>,
	linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
	"Linux Kernel" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Paweł Sikora" <pawel.sikora@agmk.net>,
	"Tom Horsley" <horsley1953@gmail.com>,
	"Jason Tibbitts" <tibbs@math.uh.edu>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] svcrpc: make svc_age_temp_xprts enqueue under sv_lock
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 14:23:03 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130215192303.GD19923@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <511BAAAA.9040804@start.ca>

svc_age_temp_xprts expires xprts in a two-step process: first it takes
the sv_lock and moves the xprts to expire off their server-wide list
(sv_tempsocks or sv_permsocks) to a local list.  Then it drops the
sv_lock and enqueues and puts each one.

I see no reason for this: svc_xprt_enqueue() will take sp_lock, but the
sv_lock and sp_lock are not otherwise nested anywhere (and documentation
at the top of this file claims it's correct to nest these with sp_lock
inside.)

Cc: stable@kernel.org
Tested-by: Jason Tibbitts <tibbs@math.uh.edu>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
---
 net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c |   15 ++-------------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c b/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c
index 5a9d40c..11a33c8 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c
@@ -863,7 +863,6 @@ static void svc_age_temp_xprts(unsigned long closure)
 	struct svc_serv *serv = (struct svc_serv *)closure;
 	struct svc_xprt *xprt;
 	struct list_head *le, *next;
-	LIST_HEAD(to_be_aged);
 
 	dprintk("svc_age_temp_xprts\n");
 
@@ -884,25 +883,15 @@ static void svc_age_temp_xprts(unsigned long closure)
 		if (atomic_read(&xprt->xpt_ref.refcount) > 1 ||
 		    test_bit(XPT_BUSY, &xprt->xpt_flags))
 			continue;
-		svc_xprt_get(xprt);
-		list_move(le, &to_be_aged);
+		list_del_init(le);
 		set_bit(XPT_CLOSE, &xprt->xpt_flags);
 		set_bit(XPT_DETACHED, &xprt->xpt_flags);
-	}
-	spin_unlock_bh(&serv->sv_lock);
-
-	while (!list_empty(&to_be_aged)) {
-		le = to_be_aged.next;
-		/* fiddling the xpt_list node is safe 'cos we're XPT_DETACHED */
-		list_del_init(le);
-		xprt = list_entry(le, struct svc_xprt, xpt_list);
-
 		dprintk("queuing xprt %p for closing\n", xprt);
 
 		/* a thread will dequeue and close it soon */
 		svc_xprt_enqueue(xprt);
-		svc_xprt_put(xprt);
 	}
+	spin_unlock_bh(&serv->sv_lock);
 
 	mod_timer(&serv->sv_temptimer, jiffies + svc_conn_age_period * HZ);
 }
-- 
1.7.9.5


  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-02-15 19:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-14 16:17 BUG at net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c:921 Mark Lord
2013-01-14 20:37 ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-01-15  4:16   ` Mark Lord
2013-01-15 20:56     ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-01-16  5:20       ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
2013-01-16 22:51         ` Mark Lord
2013-01-16 22:58           ` Mark Lord
2013-01-17  5:05           ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
2013-01-17 13:03             ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-01-17 13:24               ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
2013-01-17 23:41                 ` Mark Lord
2013-01-18  5:37                   ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
2013-01-18 15:48                     ` Mark Lord
2013-01-18 15:56                       ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-01-21  8:19                         ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
2013-01-20 22:51                     ` BUG at net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c:921 (another one) Mark Lord
2013-02-12 20:52                       ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-02-13 15:00                         ` Mark Lord
2013-02-15 19:22                           ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-02-15 19:42                             ` Tom Horsley
2013-02-15 19:46                               ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-02-15 19:23                           ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2013-02-15 19:23                             ` [PATCH 2/2] svcrpc: fix rpc server shutdown races J. Bruce Fields
2013-02-15 19:33                         ` BUG at net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c:921 (another one) Paweł Sikora
2013-02-17 15:54                           ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-02-18  7:42                             ` Paweł Sikora
2013-01-17 13:11 ` BUG at net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c:921 Mark Lord
2013-01-17 13:53   ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-01-17 23:40     ` Mark Lord
2013-02-25 20:45     ` Mark Lord
2013-02-25 20:52       ` J. Bruce Fields

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130215192303.GD19923@fieldses.org \
    --to=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=horsley1953@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel@start.ca \
    --cc=kernel@teksavvy.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pawel.sikora@agmk.net \
    --cc=skinsbursky@parallels.com \
    --cc=tibbs@math.uh.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.