From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann) Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2013 23:15:18 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 01/11] ARM: disable virt_to_bus/virt_to_bus almost everywhere In-Reply-To: References: <1360849767-1463135-1-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> <1360849767-1463135-2-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> Message-ID: <201302162315.18551.arnd@arndb.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Saturday 16 February 2013, Emilio L?pez wrote: > Small nitpick: Please have a look at the patch subject, I suppose you > meant something like "virt_to_bus/bus_to_virt" instead of > "virt_to_bus/virt_to_bus". Yes, absolutely right, thanks for your attention. The patch is already applied to a stable branch now, so I would prefer not to rebase it though. If there is an important reason to change the applied patches, I will fix this one as well. Arnd From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754986Ab3BPXPd (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Feb 2013 18:15:33 -0500 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.9]:59082 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754700Ab3BPXPc (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Feb 2013 18:15:32 -0500 From: Arnd Bergmann To: Emilio =?iso-8859-1?q?L=F3pez?= Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] ARM: disable virt_to_bus/virt_to_bus almost everywhere Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2013 23:15:18 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.2 (Linux/3.8.0-6-generic; KDE/4.3.2; x86_64; ; ) Cc: arm@kernel.org, Russell King , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org References: <1360849767-1463135-1-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> <1360849767-1463135-2-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <201302162315.18551.arnd@arndb.de> X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:dHdBbLKDthRoKwRg+RqHI4/0ooMyWS/jkiaUhC107CI EUVPsrMadSnIncdpZcQ20Y0YogiAZksCGdOIZKH43Ik9BXJJp3 BJDP08PkC/mgbT/btADtb5hbhOvOazLArbkJIRSTgNsn/3wkRU evU8Vkpcwu980twdpY1xO3yDmfimc0V4nZPawB8MdQrf2dbKnK xPNOjvt0k0eaqq+SPyHjig/eMUqG1s8hPvj3sGz1oYFLfl0kFV N0soVoFRcxbqlj/2AXI/TNOSmXPae92lLeWuaTYvvhUlKGrc8/ IqF0WhAwgTyCZRGU+ntGiYqY+u/lZmUuGk/UK4rmgmohsvJUvi xLWRTvg/cOs6VrQOQFog= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Saturday 16 February 2013, Emilio López wrote: > Small nitpick: Please have a look at the patch subject, I suppose you > meant something like "virt_to_bus/bus_to_virt" instead of > "virt_to_bus/virt_to_bus". Yes, absolutely right, thanks for your attention. The patch is already applied to a stable branch now, so I would prefer not to rebase it though. If there is an important reason to change the applied patches, I will fix this one as well. Arnd