From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mika Westerberg Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] HID: sensor-hub: don't limit the driver only to USB bus Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 13:33:20 +0200 Message-ID: <20130218113320.GA2338@intel.com> References: <1360578679-7029-1-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> <1360578679-7029-3-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> <51220A68.9030608@ahsoftware.de> <20130218111217.GL20771@intel.com> <51220F12.2060908@ahsoftware.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <51220F12.2060908@ahsoftware.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Alexander Holler Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Kosina , Benjamin Tissoires , linux-input@vger.kernel.org, srinivas.pandruvada@intel.com List-Id: linux-input@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 12:22:58PM +0100, Alexander Holler wrote: > Am 18.02.2013 12:12, schrieb Mika Westerberg: > >On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 12:03:04PM +0100, Alexander Holler wrote: > >>Am 11.02.2013 11:31, schrieb Mika Westerberg: > >>>We now have two transport mediums: USB and I2C, where sensor hubs can > >>>exists. So instead of constraining the driver to only these two we let it > >>>to match any HID bus as long as the group is HID_GROUP_SENSOR_HUB. > >>> > >>>Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg > >>>--- > >>> drivers/hid/hid-sensor-hub.c | 3 ++- > >>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > >>> > >>>diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-hub.c b/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-hub.c > >>>index 2643bce9..c01f10d 100644 > >>>--- a/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-hub.c > >>>+++ b/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-hub.c > >>>@@ -603,7 +603,8 @@ static void sensor_hub_remove(struct hid_device *hdev) > >>> } > >>> > >>> static const struct hid_device_id sensor_hub_devices[] = { > >>>- { HID_DEVICE(BUS_USB, HID_GROUP_SENSOR_HUB, HID_ANY_ID, HID_ANY_ID) }, > >>>+ { HID_DEVICE(HID_BUS_ANY, HID_GROUP_SENSOR_HUB, HID_ANY_ID, > >>>+ HID_ANY_ID) }, > >>> { } > >>> }; > >>> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(hid, sensor_hub_devices); > >>> > >> > >>Hmm, what happens with Bluetooth sensor-hubs? Is the driver now able > >>to handle them too? > > > >It should, yes. > > If so, I think patch 1/3 should be modified accordingly. Do you know if such devices exists currently? If not, I'm not sure if it makes sense to do that now.