All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Omair M. Abdullah" <omair.m.abdullah@intel.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: Ramesh Babu <ramesh.babu@linux.intel.com>,
	alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, vinod.koul@linux.intel.com,
	vaibhav.agarwal@intel.com, lgirdwood@gmail.com,
	Omair Mohammed Abdullah <omair.m.abdullah@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: Jack: add configurable option for irq_flag
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 18:25:17 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130218125516.GC23031@oma-dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130217173015.GD1583@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>

On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 06:11:45PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 12:07:25PM +0530, Omair M. Abdullah wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 12:17:27PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> 
> > > It sounds like all you're looking for here is a better debounce
> > > algorithm, for example one that delays for a bit then starts polling the
> > > GPIO state at a higher rate and declares a result when the GPIO state
> > > doesn't change for a few polls.
> 
> > We are using a polling mechanism in our system to check the jack state a few
> > times. But what we observed is that we always get a bounce.
> 
> If you're already doing that then this is at best redundant and at worst
> will make things worse if you do happen to hit a case where you don't
> see any bounce for some reason.
> 
> > Also, we do have a system where we are using the snd_soc_jack_gpio code for a
> > codec interrupt through a GPIO line, like Ramesh mentioned - even if it is just
> > for re-using the software debounce mechanism. In such cases, the interrupt would
> > be triggered on one edge only. Maybe that is not the original intent the of that
> > code?
> 
> What you're describing does not sound at all sane, the GPIO jack code is
> there for managing GPIO jacks not for providing a generic debounce
> mechanism for interrupts.  I'm not sure how you'd actually go about
> doing this...
If you have the codec interrupt line which is connected to the SoC through a
GPIO then this is possible.

  reply	other threads:[~2013-02-18 12:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-02-12  5:37 [PATCH] ASoC: Jack: add configurable option for irq_flag Omair Mohammed Abdullah
2013-02-12 11:47 ` Mark Brown
2013-02-13  5:39   ` Ramesh Babu
2013-02-13 13:19     ` Mark Brown
2013-02-15  7:10       ` Omair M. Abdullah
2013-02-15 12:17         ` Mark Brown
2013-02-17  6:37           ` Omair M. Abdullah
2013-02-17 18:11             ` Mark Brown
2013-02-18 12:55               ` Omair M. Abdullah [this message]
2013-02-18 13:29                 ` Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130218125516.GC23031@oma-dev \
    --to=omair.m.abdullah@intel.com \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
    --cc=omair.m.abdullah@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ramesh.babu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=vaibhav.agarwal@intel.com \
    --cc=vinod.koul@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.