[U-Boot] Please pull u-boot-x86.git

[Tom Rini <trini@ti.com>]

On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 01:32:58PM -0800, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Wolfgang,
> 
> On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de> wrote:
> > Dear Simon Glass,
> >
> > In message <CAPnjgZ2P6sBDXiwXW2TeCdjADMhkN5iNBGrpZbtvwMqUtYVVxA@mail.gmail.com> you wrote:
> >> Hi Tom,
> >>
> >> This series includes the sandbox map_sysmem() feature, and gets the
> >> memory and hashing functions running on sandbox to allow testing/code
> >> coverage. I have run it through buildman and it seems clean, with the
> >> proviso that I don't have fully-working toolchains for all
> >> architectures.
> >
> > NAK. It is not correct to push changes that affect global code
> > through a arch-specific custodian tree, especially if the submitter
> > of the patche(es) is identical to the custodian of the very tree, and
> > even more so if there have been not ANY independent Acked-by: or at
> > least Tested-by: messages.
> >
> > This is NOT how the peer review process is supposed to work!!
> >
> > Especially as a custodian you must not do such things.
> 
> OK, I was not quite sure what to do, so may have misunderstood Tom's
> instructions - there is a short thread here
> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/153342
> 
> I have created a patchwork bundle instead.
> 
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/bundle/sjg/sandbox-mem/

OK, I thought I said, but maybe I didn't, I'm OK with re-using the tree,
but _not_ the master branch,  u-boot-x86/sandbox would have been fine.

-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20130218/e90cd718/attachment.pgp>