From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Alireza Haghdoost <haghdoost@gmail.com>
Cc: fio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Timing information between I/Os in iolog replay
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 08:46:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130219074608.GC26519@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAB-428=TxUnVOq-NaJGn35dL0nqtyGWwAH2Aajc+BFjnFn_D7A@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Feb 19 2013, Alireza Haghdoost wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to understand how fio respect timing information between
> consecutive IOs in a read_iolog job, However the logic is not very
> clear for me , specially in the following function:
>
> static int read_iolog2(struct thread_data *td, FILE *f)
> {
> ...
> r = sscanf(p, "%256s %256s %llu %u", fname, act, &offset,
> &bytes);
> ...
> if (!strcmp(act, "wait"))
> rw = DDIR_WAIT;
> ...
> if (rw == DDIR_WAIT) {
> ipo->delay = offset;
> ...
> queue_io_piece(td, ipo);
> }
>
> Here is my two questions about this function:
> First, I can not see any "wait" command in a typical iolog file
> (collected with write_iolog=str job option). Should I set special
> parameter in job file to collect iolog with respect to IO timing
> information.
> Second, Why request offset assigned to ipo->delay ? I was thinking
> that ipo->delay should get some timing value which represent
> inter-submission time delay. However, In this case ipo->delay get LBA
> offset which just a byte address in my point view.
That is the format of a delay line, instead of an LBA it has a timing
parameter. Normally you don't have delays at all, it's only for replay
and record of blktraces that would be a factor.
--
Jens Axboe
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-19 7:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-19 7:36 Timing information between I/Os in iolog replay Alireza Haghdoost
2013-02-19 7:46 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130219074608.GC26519@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=fio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=haghdoost@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.