Re: [next:akpm 16/587] drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c:6231:2: error: call to '__compiletime_assert_6235' declared with attribute error: BUILD_BUG_ON failed: SKB_WITH_OVERHEAD(IGB_RX_BUFSZ) < (NET_SKB_PAD + NET_IP_ALIGN + IGB_TS_HDR_LEN + ETH_FRAME_LEN + ETH_FCS_LEN)

[Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>]

On Mon, 18 Feb 2013 19:27:22 +0800
kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com> wrote:

> tree:   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git akpm
> head:   ae9da2a24a80423b8dbda9c5a72674ce6e7861be
> commit: f7d7e38e6df399b2af7f04c177054abdd744a077 [16/587] bug.h, compiler.h: Introduce compiletime_assert & BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG
> config: make ARCH=s390 allmodconfig
> 
> All error/warnings:
> 
>    In function 'igb_build_rx_buffer',
>        inlined from 'igb_clean_rx_irq' at drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c:6705:8:
> >> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c:6231:2: error: call to '__compiletime_assert_6235' declared with attribute error: BUILD_BUG_ON failed: SKB_WITH_OVERHEAD(IGB_RX_BUFSZ) < (NET_SKB_PAD + NET_IP_ALIGN + IGB_TS_HDR_LEN + ETH_FRAME_LEN + ETH_FCS_LEN)
> 
> vim +/__compiletime_assert_6235 +6231 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
> 
>   6225	#endif
>   6226	
>   6227		/* If we spanned a buffer we have a huge mess so test for it */
>   6228		BUG_ON(unlikely(!igb_test_staterr(rx_desc, E1000_RXD_STAT_EOP)));
>   6229	
>   6230		/* Guarantee this function can be used by verifying buffer sizes */
> > 6231		BUILD_BUG_ON(SKB_WITH_OVERHEAD(IGB_RX_BUFSZ) < (NET_SKB_PAD +
>   6232								NET_IP_ALIGN +
>   6233								IGB_TS_HDR_LEN +
>   6234								ETH_FRAME_LEN +
> 

That BUILD_BUG_ON() triggers without Daniel's patches applied as well:

  CC [M]  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.o
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c: In function 'igb_build_rx_buffer':
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c:6231: error: size of array 'type name' is negative

I suspect that driver is busted on s390.  Dunno why.  Here's what cpp emits:


s390 allmodconfig:

bool __cond = !(!(((2048) - (((sizeof(struct skb_shared_info)) + (256 - 1)) & ~(256 - 1))) < (32 + 2 + 16 + 1514 + 4)));


x86_64 allmodconfig:

bool __cond = !(!(((2048) - (((sizeof(struct skb_shared_info)) + ((1 <<
(6)) - 1)) & ~((1 << (6)) - 1))) < (({ typeof(32) _max1 = (32); typeof((1
<< (6))) _max2 = ((1 << (6))); (void) (&_max1 == &_max2); _max1 > _max2 ? _max1 : _max2; }) + 0 + 16 + 1514 + 4)));


I doubt if anyone will be running this driver on s390, but I guess we
should work out why it broke.