From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp2-g21.free.fr (smtp2-g21.free.fr [212.27.42.2]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EE49E006CB for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 06:04:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from e6520eb (pac33-2-82-240-38-71.fbx.proxad.net [82.240.38.71]) (Authenticated sender: eukrea) by smtp2-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6091D4B017B; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 15:03:59 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 15:03:57 +0100 From: Eric =?UTF-8?B?QsOpbmFyZA==?= To: Richard Purdie Message-ID: <20130219150357.76a0788e@e6520eb> In-Reply-To: <1361282381.5927.41.camel@ted> References: <1361277447-6186-1-git-send-email-otavio@ossystems.com.br> <1361277447-6186-2-git-send-email-otavio@ossystems.com.br> <20130219144408.52766c34@e6520eb> <1361282381.5927.41.camel@ted> Organization: =?UTF-8?B?RXVrcsOpYQ==?= Electromatique X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.13; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: meta-freescale Mailing List , Otavio Salvador Subject: Re: [meta-fsl-arm][PATCH 1/3] linux-libc-headers: Use Yocto's default to avoid same arch rebuilds X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:04:08 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Le Tue, 19 Feb 2013 05:59:41 -0800, Richard Purdie a =C3=A9crit : > On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 14:44 +0100, Eric B=C3=A9nard wrote: > > Hi Otavio, > >=20 > > Le Tue, 19 Feb 2013 09:37:25 -0300, > > Otavio Salvador a =C3=A9crit : > >=20 > > > This avoids full rebuild in case of compatible machine changes (e.g > > > i.MX53 and i.MX6) and fixes the build failures seen in autobuilder. > > >=20 > > aren't Frescale's headers needed for some GPU/VPU libraries ? >=20 > The GPU/VPU libraries should be looking at the kernel headers, not the > libc headers. >=20 yes, I just looked at the recipe efter sending the mail and remembered the difference ;-) > If you put the kernel headers in as libc headers, it means the whole > stack is machine specific and will entirely rebuild with each machine > switch. The libc headers are meant to be machine independent. >=20 > I suspect the situation after these patches still isn't perfect (see my > other reply) however it is *much* improved and I much appreciate this > being fixed. We've seen build repeated failures on the autobuilder for > what seems like months due to this problem. very good. Eric