From: willy@linux.intel.com (Matthew Wilcox)
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] nvme: fix the placement of set_current_state to TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 10:05:38 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130219150538.GA4530@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51103A15.8010508@linux.intel.com>
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013@02:45:41PM -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> the nvme driver has a kthread that processes certain events periodically.
> However, the kthread also gets woken for certain urgent actions.
>
> The current code does not use the current_state logic correctly;
> it calls set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE); right before doing
> a schedule_timeout(), with the result that there is a race condition
> where a wakeup can get lost, and thus delayed by one second.
>
> This patch moves the set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE); to before
> the place where the queue of outstanding work is checked, to close
> the race condition
The thing is, that's not a queue of outstanding work, that's the list
of devices that exist in the system. Your patch makes the kthread do
all of its work in the TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE state, which I don't think is
right either (is it?)
We could add a flag to indicate that there's urgent work to be done
(checked after setting TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE), or just live with the
occasional race.
Alternatively, we could get rid of the kthread in favour of timers
for cancelling commands and a workqueue for dealing with urgent work.
I have this on my long-term todo list, but in the absence of having
hardware to test with on large-scale systems, I didn't want to make such
a large change.
next parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-19 15:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <51103A15.8010508@linux.intel.com>
2013-02-19 15:05 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2013-02-19 16:30 ` [PATCH 2/2] nvme: fix the placement of set_current_state to TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE Arjan van de Ven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130219150538.GA4530@linux.intel.com \
--to=willy@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.