From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 09:50:25 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 0/4] dw_dmac: introduce generic DMA binding for DT In-Reply-To: <20130220080348.GF23302@intel.com> References: <1360952512-971558-1-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> <20130220080348.GF23302@intel.com> Message-ID: <201302200950.26182.arnd@arndb.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wednesday 20 February 2013, Vinod Koul wrote: > Since there is still churn, would it make sense if I just revert the SPEAr13xx > patch (your first patch) and send a pull request to Linus. > Since there are no users and not much testing has been done, I think we can push > these to 3.10 via arm-soc/slave-dma tree. > > Gives more testing and usage will go along as well. > Since merge window is open, I would like my pull to go soonish and not churn the > tree much. Reverting the SPEAr13xx would definitely help, yes. The reason why I'd also like to see the second patch get merged is so that we can do the SPEAr changes in 3.10 without having an interdependency between the trees. I tried very hard to make the patch have a minimal impact on the non-DT code path to avoid regressions. Maybe you can send your tree now with just the revert applied, and then send the other one separately next week along with any bug fixes that may have accumulated by then? Arnd From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] dw_dmac: introduce generic DMA binding for DT Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 09:50:25 +0000 Message-ID: <201302200950.26182.arnd@arndb.de> References: <1360952512-971558-1-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> <20130220080348.GF23302@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20130220080348.GF23302-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org Sender: "devicetree-discuss" To: Vinod Koul Cc: Viresh Kumar , devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Andy Shevchenko , Dan Williams , linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 20 February 2013, Vinod Koul wrote: > Since there is still churn, would it make sense if I just revert the SPEAr13xx > patch (your first patch) and send a pull request to Linus. > Since there are no users and not much testing has been done, I think we can push > these to 3.10 via arm-soc/slave-dma tree. > > Gives more testing and usage will go along as well. > Since merge window is open, I would like my pull to go soonish and not churn the > tree much. Reverting the SPEAr13xx would definitely help, yes. The reason why I'd also like to see the second patch get merged is so that we can do the SPEAr changes in 3.10 without having an interdependency between the trees. I tried very hard to make the patch have a minimal impact on the non-DT code path to avoid regressions. Maybe you can send your tree now with just the revert applied, and then send the other one separately next week along with any bug fixes that may have accumulated by then? Arnd From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934793Ab3BTJuo (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Feb 2013 04:50:44 -0500 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.187]:57364 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933374Ab3BTJul (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Feb 2013 04:50:41 -0500 From: Arnd Bergmann To: Vinod Koul Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] dw_dmac: introduce generic DMA binding for DT Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 09:50:25 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.2 (Linux/3.8.0-6-generic; KDE/4.3.2; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Dan Williams , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, Viresh Kumar , Olof Johansson , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andy Shevchenko References: <1360952512-971558-1-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> <20130220080348.GF23302@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20130220080348.GF23302@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201302200950.26182.arnd@arndb.de> X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:KzIGKSEU1aeBzPxu7TPeNm2tPk959k/p+2kz2fdtn1E EHEG+wahUHvk+xDJr9mK42M/2Qr9ADoh4AC7TZZQcCuOvV/zwe IEIT1ccBKCMiPhHdOLQgTJo/pFprj2gyegIulxdXSAwlAcXMpL LIEjtI+ahkr+s9DmNIOQTsPkyXAh4E4fR9cPnVxZtR+OjuHz68 fvT0CxpiDTI3Vd9UVl7Dk4zMitRoBI9XrLc7FA0dC7I2+EAP8h gn4p2R96rtJLJEPmGA3VQ7YkMEZFZcXXmP4+Fkw5Ayov06U2BY mIn4HnxJGiqeigdvSZTx9D1UnV8MaYu9qSQBwRaWSfkak/iiNO 2cP+Q8sfbFCs9qw9mY8o= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 20 February 2013, Vinod Koul wrote: > Since there is still churn, would it make sense if I just revert the SPEAr13xx > patch (your first patch) and send a pull request to Linus. > Since there are no users and not much testing has been done, I think we can push > these to 3.10 via arm-soc/slave-dma tree. > > Gives more testing and usage will go along as well. > Since merge window is open, I would like my pull to go soonish and not churn the > tree much. Reverting the SPEAr13xx would definitely help, yes. The reason why I'd also like to see the second patch get merged is so that we can do the SPEAr changes in 3.10 without having an interdependency between the trees. I tried very hard to make the patch have a minimal impact on the non-DT code path to avoid regressions. Maybe you can send your tree now with just the revert applied, and then send the other one separately next week along with any bug fixes that may have accumulated by then? Arnd