From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp2-g21.free.fr (smtp2-g21.free.fr [212.27.42.2]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2404CE002AB for ; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 09:19:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from e6520eb (pac33-2-82-240-38-71.fbx.proxad.net [82.240.38.71]) (Authenticated sender: eukrea) by smtp2-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 814E04B01A3; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 18:18:57 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 18:18:55 +0100 From: Eric =?UTF-8?B?QsOpbmFyZA==?= To: McClintock Matthew-B29882 Message-ID: <20130228181855.4e134dc5@e6520eb> In-Reply-To: <70CC66F5C30A414DADDA6973E4CA391A893B4D@039-SN1MPN1-001.039d.mgd.msft.net> References: <512E67D4.8060600@mindchasers.com> <70CC66F5C30A414DADDA6973E4CA391A8935DD@039-SN1MPN1-001.039d.mgd.msft.net> <70CC66F5C30A414DADDA6973E4CA391A893604@039-SN1MPN1-001.039d.mgd.msft.net> <512F6A96.8050102@mindchasers.com> <70CC66F5C30A414DADDA6973E4CA391A893ADC@039-SN1MPN1-001.039d.mgd.msft.net> <20130228170614.634bca07@e6520eb> <70CC66F5C30A414DADDA6973E4CA391A893B4D@039-SN1MPN1-001.039d.mgd.msft.net> Organization: =?UTF-8?B?RXVrcsOpYQ==?= Electromatique X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.13; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: "meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org" , Otavio Salvador , "yocto@linux.freescale.net" Subject: Re: Please review the proposal of FSL Yocto layers reorg X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 17:19:08 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Le Thu, 28 Feb 2013 16:52:02 +0000, McClintock Matthew-B29882 a =C3=A9crit : > I think you misinterpreted the intent of my statement, the goal is to > provide the best support we can for the open source versions and get > feedback as well. However, specifically stating what will be done for > each release, branch, layer, etc is not something that is a > deliverable on the open source end and I don't see it happening soon. > That being said, there is no malicious intent and supporting upstream > and making it work as well as possible is the ultimate goal so our SDK > release requires less effort and work. >=20 I may have misinterpreted your statement but it seems you make a difference between the open source version and the SDK release : isn't that roughly the same thing when we talk of meta-fsl-* where the SDK release can be seen as a snapshots of the opensource stable branch at the date of the release ? If not what are the differences ? Also, do you plan to sync the public accessible git tree only when you do a release or will they get the patches in "realtime" ? Eric