From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/Intel: Provide comments for which model is what. Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2013 10:30:42 -0500 Message-ID: <20130301153042.GC8757@phenom.dumpdata.com> References: <1362148308-4429-1-git-send-email-konrad.wilk@oracle.com> <1362148308-4429-2-git-send-email-konrad.wilk@oracle.com> <20130301144508.GB40913@ocelot.phlegethon.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130301144508.GB40913@ocelot.phlegethon.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Tim Deegan Cc: boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, jun.nakajima@intel.com, jbeulich@suse.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 02:45:08PM +0000, Tim Deegan wrote: > At 09:31 -0500 on 01 Mar (1362130307), Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > + case 15: /* original 65 nm celeron/pentium/core2/xeon, "Merom"/"Conroe" */ > > + case 23: /* current 45 nm celeron/core2/xeon "Penryn"/"Wolfdale" */ > > No opinion about the patch in general, but it might be better not to say > "current" here, at least without attaching a date. OK. How about this: commit 7de84d0668df18977ebc9c299d6562676e76dbd5 Author: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Date: Fri Mar 1 09:21:35 2013 -0500 x86/Intel: Provide comments for which model is what. [v1: Tim suggested to remove 'current' from the comments] Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vpmu_core2.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vpmu_core2.c index 2cef2d6..5d22a70 100644 --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vpmu_core2.c +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vpmu_core2.c @@ -738,16 +738,16 @@ int vmx_vpmu_initialise(struct vcpu *v, unsigned int vpmu_flags) { switch ( cpu_model ) { - case 15: - case 23: - case 26: - case 29: - case 42: - case 45: - case 46: - case 47: - case 58: - case 62: + case 15: /* original 65 nm celeron/pentium/core2/xeon, "Merom"/"Conroe" */ + case 23: /* 45 nm celeron/core2/xeon "Penryn"/"Wolfdale" */ + case 26: /* 45 nm nehalem, "Bloomfield" */ + case 29: /* six-core 45 nm xeon "Dunnington" */ + case 42: /* SandyBridge */ + case 45: /* SandyBridge, "Romely-EP" */ + case 46: /* 45 nm nehalem-ex, "Beckton" */ + case 47: /* 32 nm Xeon E7 */ + case 58: /* IvyBridge */ + case 62: /* IvyBridge EP */ ret = core2_vpmu_initialise(v, vpmu_flags); if ( !ret ) vpmu->arch_vpmu_ops = &core2_vpmu_ops;