From: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
Cc: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>,
"sameo@linux.intel.com" <sameo@linux.intel.com>,
"gg@slimlogic.co.uk" <gg@slimlogic.co.uk>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>,
"ian@slimlogic.co.uk" <ian@slimlogic.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: palmas: provide irq flags through DT/platform data
Date: Sat, 2 Mar 2013 11:35:27 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130302033525.GD6610@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <513102D0.5030609@wwwdotorg.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 571 bytes --]
On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 12:34:40PM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:
> Is Palmas a family of chips rather than a single chip then? That
> implies that the DT would need two compatible values, e.g.:
Yes.
> compatible = "ti,12345", "ti,palmas";
> ... where "12345" is the actual chip name.
> ... rather than just the following which IIRC was in the example in
> the DT binding document in another patch series:
> compatible = "ti,palmas";
Indeed, and in fact this has already been done for the I2C device ID
table. We should have the same list of devices in the OF IDs.
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-02 3:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-01 12:34 [PATCH] mfd: palmas: provide irq flags through DT/platform data Laxman Dewangan
2013-03-01 12:43 ` Mark Brown
2013-03-01 12:55 ` Laxman Dewangan
2013-03-01 13:16 ` Mark Brown
2013-03-01 19:34 ` Stephen Warren
2013-03-02 3:35 ` Mark Brown [this message]
2013-03-02 12:13 ` Graeme Gregory
2013-03-02 12:21 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130302033525.GD6610@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--to=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=gg@slimlogic.co.uk \
--cc=ian@slimlogic.co.uk \
--cc=ldewangan@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
--cc=swarren@nvidia.com \
--cc=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.