From: Martin Steigerwald <Martin@lichtvoll.de>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Hugo Mills <hugo@carfax.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] [RFC] RAID-level terminology change
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2013 12:23:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201303101223.56805.Martin@lichtvoll.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1362861071-12589-1-git-send-email-hugo@carfax.org.uk>
Hi Hugo,
Am Samstag, 9. März 2013 schrieb Hugo Mills:
> Some time ago, and occasionally since, we've discussed altering the
> "RAID-n" terminology to change it to an "nCmSpP" format, where n is the
> number of copies, m is the number of (data) devices in a stripe per copy,
> and p is the number of parity devices in a stripe.
>
> The current kernel implementation uses as many devices as it can in
> the striped modes (RAID-0, -10, -5, -6), and in this implementation,
> that is written as "mS" (with a literal "m"). The mS and pP sections are
> omitted if the value is 1S or 0P.
>
> The magic look-up table for old-style / new-style is:
>
> single 1C (or omitted, in btrfs fi df output)
> RAID-0 1CmS
> RAID-1 2C
> DUP 2CD
What does the "D" in "2CD" mean? Its not explained above, unless I miss
something.
> RAID-10 2CmS
> RAID-5 1CmS1P
> RAID-6 1CmS2P
I think its great to clarify the RAID-level terminology, but I find the new
notation a bit, hmmm, cryptic.
Maybe for displaying it would be nice to show a more verbose format like
2 copies, many stripes, 1 parity (1CmS1P)
by default and the abbreviated one in parentheses?
Any other idea to make it less cryptic?
Thanks,
--
Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de
GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-10 11:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-09 20:31 [PATCH 0/5] [RFC] RAID-level terminology change Hugo Mills
2013-03-09 20:31 ` [PATCH 1/5] Use nCmSpP format for mkfs Hugo Mills
2013-03-09 20:31 ` [PATCH 2/5] Move parse_profile to utils.c Hugo Mills
2013-03-09 20:31 ` [PATCH 3/5] Convert balance filter parser to use common nCmSpP replication-level parser Hugo Mills
2013-03-09 20:31 ` [PATCH 4/5] Change output of btrfs fi df to report new (or old) RAID names Hugo Mills
2013-03-09 20:31 ` [PATCH 5/5] Add man page description for nCmSpP replication levels Hugo Mills
2013-03-10 14:01 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2013-03-10 17:20 ` Hugo Mills
2013-03-10 17:52 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2013-03-09 21:38 ` [PATCH 0/5] [RFC] RAID-level terminology change Harald Glatt
[not found] ` <CAFWF=am4ki529Zez4123gYk3BD+Z9RONRpAK7NZe=skHzcdMiw@mail.gmail.com>
2013-03-09 21:46 ` Hugo Mills
2013-03-09 22:25 ` Roger Binns
2013-03-10 1:44 ` Hugo Mills
2013-03-10 5:41 ` Roger Binns
2013-03-10 6:29 ` Harald Glatt
2013-03-10 6:37 ` Harald Glatt
2013-03-10 11:31 ` Martin Steigerwald
2013-03-10 11:48 ` Roger Binns
2013-03-10 22:04 ` Hugo Mills
2013-03-11 0:21 ` Roger Binns
2013-03-27 4:27 ` Brendan Hide
2013-03-27 5:24 ` Roger Binns
2013-03-10 11:23 ` Martin Steigerwald [this message]
2013-03-10 14:11 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2013-03-10 21:36 ` Hugo Mills
2013-03-10 21:45 ` Harald Glatt
2013-03-10 22:59 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2013-03-10 22:06 ` Harald Glatt
2013-03-10 23:06 ` Diego Calleja
2013-03-10 15:43 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2013-03-10 22:24 ` Hugo Mills
2013-03-10 22:42 ` Harald Glatt
2013-03-10 23:40 ` sam tygier
2013-03-10 23:49 ` Hugo Mills
2013-03-11 14:14 ` David Sterba
2013-03-10 23:55 ` sam tygier
2013-03-11 8:56 ` Hugo Mills
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201303101223.56805.Martin@lichtvoll.de \
--to=martin@lichtvoll.de \
--cc=hugo@carfax.org.uk \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.