From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Jack Morgenstein <jackm@dev.mellanox.co.il>
Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>,
Or Gerlitz <or.gerlitz@gmail.com>,
Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@mellanox.com>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Roland Dreier <roland@kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, Yan Burman <yanb@mellanox.com>,
Liran Liss <liranl@mellanox.com>
Subject: Re: hitting lockdep warning as of too early VF probe with 3.9-rc1
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2013 09:37:38 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130310163738.GC4392@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201303101728.50883.jackm@dev.mellanox.co.il>
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 05:28:50PM +0200, Jack Morgenstein wrote:
> Hello, Ming, Greg, Roland, Dave, all...
>
> From a quick scan of ethernet drivers in Dave Miller's net-next git, I
> notice that the following drivers (apart from the Mellanox mlx4 driver)
> enable SRIOV during the PF probe:
> cisco enic (function "enic_probe")
> neterion vxge driver(function "vxge_probe")
> Solarflare efx driver (function "efx_pci_probe", which invokes "efx_sriov_init")
> emulex driver (function "be_probe" --> be_setup --> be_vf_setup)
>
> It would seem that these drivers are susceptible to the nested probe/deadlock
> race condition as well.
>
> I believe that it is healthiest for everyone if the probe code in the kernel itself
> would avoid such nested probe calls (rather than forcing vendors to deal
> with this issue). The kernel code is certainly aware
> (or could easily track) that it is invoking the a driver's probe function
> while that same probe function has already been invoked and has not yet returned!
Patches to handle this are always gladly accepted.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-10 16:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-05 15:21 hitting lockdep warning as of too early VF probe with 3.9-rc1 Or Gerlitz
2013-03-06 2:43 ` Ming Lei
2013-03-06 20:54 ` Or Gerlitz
2013-03-07 2:03 ` Ming Lei
2013-03-10 15:28 ` Jack Morgenstein
2013-03-10 16:37 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2013-03-11 1:26 ` Ming Lei
2013-03-11 20:24 ` Ben Hutchings
2013-04-17 15:14 ` Or Gerlitz
2013-04-11 15:25 ` [PATCH for-3.9] pci: avoid work_on_cpu for nested SRIOV probes Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-04-18 20:08 ` [PATCHv2 " Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-04-18 21:40 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-04-18 21:57 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-04-19 14:36 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
[not found] ` <CAOS58YO+uV5KkS=sTP9Y3BPPh1nVnQ06yRyNU8GvEbym7R+X+Q@mail.gmail.com>
2013-04-19 16:39 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-04-20 19:05 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130310163738.GC4392@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jackm@dev.mellanox.co.il \
--cc=liranl@mellanox.com \
--cc=ming.lei@canonical.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ogerlitz@mellanox.com \
--cc=or.gerlitz@gmail.com \
--cc=roland@kernel.org \
--cc=yanb@mellanox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.