From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] epoll: fix sparse error on RCU assignment
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2013 19:23:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130310182358.GA686@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130310113559.GA16551@dcvr.yhbt.net>
On 03/10, Eric Wong wrote:
>
> This fixes the following sparse error when using
> CONFIG_SPARSE_RCU_POINTER=y and "make C=2 fs/eventpoll.o"
>
> fs/eventpoll.c:514:17: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces)
ep_remove_wait_queue() does rcu_dereference(pwq->whead) and
rcu_dereference_sparse(__rcu) complains, I guess.
> --- a/fs/eventpoll.c
> +++ b/fs/eventpoll.c
> @@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ struct eppoll_entry {
> wait_queue_t wait;
>
> /* The wait queue head that linked the "wait" wait queue item */
> - wait_queue_head_t *whead;
> + wait_queue_head_t __rcu *whead;
Well, perhaps this change is fine... but otoh this this a bit misleading.
It is not actually __rcu. The special case is sighand->signalfd_wqh, and
the commemt in ep_remove_wait_queue() means: if ->whead is not stable then
we can only race with signalfd_cleanup(), and rcu_read_lock() ensures this
memory can't go away.
We do not even need smp_read_barrier_depends() here, ACCESS_ONCE() should
be enough.
Perhaps it would be better to simply shut up this warning somehow...
> };
>
> /* Wrapper struct used by poll queueing */
> @@ -929,7 +929,7 @@ static int ep_poll_callback(wait_queue_t *wait, unsigned mode, int sync, void *k
> struct eventpoll *ep = epi->ep;
>
> if ((unsigned long)key & POLLFREE) {
> - ep_pwq_from_wait(wait)->whead = NULL;
> + RCU_INIT_POINTER(ep_pwq_from_wait(wait)->whead, NULL);
> /*
> * whead = NULL above can race with ep_remove_wait_queue()
> * which can do another remove_wait_queue() after us, so we
> @@ -1018,7 +1018,7 @@ static void ep_ptable_queue_proc(struct file *file, wait_queue_head_t *whead,
>
> if (epi->nwait >= 0 && (pwq = kmem_cache_alloc(pwq_cache, GFP_KERNEL))) {
> init_waitqueue_func_entry(&pwq->wait, ep_poll_callback);
> - pwq->whead = whead;
> + RCU_INIT_POINTER(pwq->whead, whead);
> pwq->base = epi;
> add_wait_queue(whead, &pwq->wait);
> list_add_tail(&pwq->llink, &epi->pwqlist);
> --
> Eric Wong
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-10 18:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-10 11:35 [PATCH] epoll: fix sparse error on RCU assignment Eric Wong
2013-03-10 18:23 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2013-03-14 2:45 ` Eric Wong
2013-03-15 17:42 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-03-28 19:34 ` Eric Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130310182358.GA686@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davidel@xmailserver.org \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=normalperson@yhbt.net \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.