All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, fengguang.wu@intel.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jmoyer@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET] writeback: convert writeback to unbound workqueue
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 16:06:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130312150633.GZ25165@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1362692649-25570-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>

On Thu, Mar 07 2013, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> There's no reason for writeback to implement its own worker pool when
> using workqueue is much simpler and more efficient.  This patchset
> replaces writeback's custom worker pool with unbound workqueue and
> also exports it to userland using WQ_SYSFS so that it can be tuned
> from userland as requested a couple releases ago.
> 
> This patchset contains the following four patches.
> 
>  0001-implement-current_is_workqueue_rescuer.patch
>  0002-writeback-remove-unused-bdi_pending_list.patch
>  0003-writeback-replace-custom-worker-pool-implementation-.patch
>  0004-writeback-expose-the-bdi_wq-workqueue.patch
> 
> 0001-0002 are prep patches.  0003 does the conversion.  0004 makes
> bdi_wq visible to userland.
> 
> This patchset is on top of v3.9-rc1 + "workqueue: implement workqueue
> with custom worker attributes" patchset[1] and available in the
> following git branch.
> 
>  git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/wq.git review-writeback-conversion

I like it, diffstat looks nice too :-)

Have you done any performance testing, or just functional verification?

-- 
Jens Axboe


  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-03-12 15:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-03-07 21:44 [PATCHSET] writeback: convert writeback to unbound workqueue Tejun Heo
2013-03-07 21:44 ` [PATCH 1/4] implement current_is_workqueue_rescuer() Tejun Heo
2013-03-13  0:42   ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-07 21:44 ` [PATCH 2/4] writeback: remove unused bdi_pending_list Tejun Heo
2013-03-12 12:02   ` Jan Kara
2013-03-07 21:44 ` [PATCH 3/4] writeback: replace custom worker pool implementation with unbound workqueue Tejun Heo
2013-03-12 15:05   ` Jan Kara
2013-03-18 22:32     ` Jan Kara
2013-03-18 22:35       ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-19 15:46         ` Jan Kara
2013-03-19 17:28           ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-21  1:57             ` Dave Chinner
2013-03-21  5:07               ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-21 11:32                 ` Jan Kara
2013-03-21 13:08                   ` Christoph Hellwig
2013-03-21 18:37                     ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-07 21:44 ` [PATCH 4/4] writeback: expose the bdi_wq workqueue Tejun Heo
2013-03-12 15:06 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2013-03-12 17:10   ` [PATCHSET] writeback: convert writeback to unbound workqueue Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130312150633.GZ25165@kernel.dk \
    --to=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
    --cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.