Re: [PATCH 00/12] perf annotate: Add support for event group view (v2)

[Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>]

Em Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 12:21:27PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> On Mon, 11 Mar 2013 17:53:16 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > I need to go thru this more thoroughly, as at least one thing caught my
> > attention, in some cases ->nr_pcnt is used and in others
> > evsel->nr_members, do we need both?

> Probably not.  I was thought keeping an array and its length together is
> better.  But it's rather a waste to save the same information to every
> date structure so I move it to the struct annotate_browser->nr_events.
 
> For evsel->nr_members, current code sets it only for grouping is enabled
> so the individual events will have value of 0.  Also it's not pass the
> evsel to every function need it.  But if you think it should really be
> fixed that way I can make the change to pass and use evsel->nr_members.

This can be left for later, my point here is that we should try to avoid
the various UIs from diverging too much, i.e. the code for --gtk,
--stdio and --tui should be as close and using the same abstractions as
possible.
 
> Anyway, below is a fixed version that could survived my testing.

indeed, works, compared the output of --stdio --group with --tui --group
and it matches.

While looking at it I noticed that the stdio output wastes the initial
columns, at some point we may want to make the hist_entry lines match
the TUI ones, so that going back and forth on two xterm tabs shows no
differences.

Anyway, thanks, applied!

- Arnaldo