From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
To: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa_takuya_b1@lab.ntt.co.jp>,
mtosatti@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: MMU: Mark sp mmio cached when creating mmio spte
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 14:33:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130313123358.GM11223@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51402DDA.607@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 03:42:18PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> On 03/13/2013 03:28 PM, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
> > On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 13:06:23 +0800
> > Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On 03/12/2013 04:44 PM, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
> >>> This will be used not to zap unrelated mmu pages when creating/moving
> >>> a memory slot later.
> >>
> >> How about save all mmio spte into a mmio-rmap?
> >
> > The problem is that other mmu code would need to care about the pointers
> > stored in the new rmap list: when mmu_shrink zaps shadow pages for example.
>
> It is not hard... all the codes have been wrapped by *zap_spte*.
>
So are you going to send a patch? What do you think about applying this
as temporary solution?
--
Gleb.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-13 12:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-12 8:43 [PATCH 0/2] KVM: Optimize mmio spte zapping when creating/moving memslot Takuya Yoshikawa
2013-03-12 8:44 ` [PATCH 1/2] KVM: MMU: Mark sp mmio cached when creating mmio spte Takuya Yoshikawa
2013-03-13 5:06 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-03-13 7:28 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2013-03-13 7:42 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-03-13 12:33 ` Gleb Natapov [this message]
2013-03-13 12:42 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-03-13 13:40 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2013-03-13 14:05 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-03-14 1:58 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-03-14 2:26 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2013-03-14 2:39 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-03-14 5:36 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-03-14 5:13 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-03-14 5:45 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-03-16 2:01 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2013-03-12 8:45 ` [PATCH 2/2] KVM: x86: Optimize mmio spte zapping when creating/moving memslot Takuya Yoshikawa
2013-03-12 12:06 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-03-13 1:40 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-03-13 1:41 ` [PATCH 0/2] KVM: " Marcelo Tosatti
2013-03-14 8:23 ` Gleb Natapov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130313123358.GM11223@redhat.com \
--to=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=yoshikawa_takuya_b1@lab.ntt.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.