From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.saout.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.saout.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i25IrveXGAnC for ; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 11:01:50 +0100 (CET) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.186]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.saout.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 11:01:50 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 11:01:48 +0100 From: Heinz Diehl Message-ID: <20130318100148.GA1399@fancy-poultry.org> References: <20130317225516.GA6053@citd.de> <20130318083700.GA28049@citd.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130318083700.GA28049@citd.de> Subject: Re: [dm-crypt] unusual writing speeds when benchmark speeds are high enough List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: dm-crypt@saout.de On 18.03.2013, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote: > The SSD i have can reach (with encryption) about 400MB/s, but that is > best-case performance when all moons are aligned. I haven't really > benchmarked the real-world performance, the dd-example (with conv=fsync) > only got 88MB/s. On all my SSD disks, cryptsetup performance is not even near that. I have about 450 MB/s without encryption, and max. 120 MB/s with.