From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/44] ldisc patchset Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 16:54:02 -0700 Message-ID: <20130318235402.GA1937@kroah.com> References: <1361390599-15195-1-git-send-email-peter@hurleysoftware.com> <1363034704-28036-1-git-send-email-peter@hurleysoftware.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-pb0-f44.google.com ([209.85.160.44]:58906 "EHLO mail-pb0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753624Ab3CRXwr (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Mar 2013 19:52:47 -0400 Received: by mail-pb0-f44.google.com with SMTP id wz12so6827328pbc.31 for ; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 16:52:46 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1363034704-28036-1-git-send-email-peter@hurleysoftware.com> Sender: linux-serial-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org To: Peter Hurley Cc: Jiri Slaby , Sasha Levin , Dave Jones , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Shawn Guo , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 04:44:20PM -0400, Peter Hurley wrote: > Greg, > This patchset includes > 'tty: Drop lock contention stat from ldsem trylocks' > so no need to apply that on this series. Also, I noticed you > kept the 'tty is NULL' removal on a different branch so I left > my patch in this series that removes it. > > This series applies cleanly to tty-next. I've applied the first 25 patches, right up to the "create a new lock" patch. I'll comment on that one next. thanks, greg k-h