From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 11:54:56 -0400 From: David Teigland Message-ID: <20130319155456.GC986@redhat.com> References: <1363699970-10002-1-git-send-email-bubble@hoster-ok.com> <1363699970-10002-11-git-send-email-bubble@hoster-ok.com> <20130319153215.GB986@redhat.com> <5148874A.2060106@hoster-ok.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5148874A.2060106@hoster-ok.com> Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] [PATCH 10/10] man: document --node option to lvchange Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Vladislav Bogdanov Cc: linux-lvm@redhat.com On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 06:42:02PM +0300, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: > And... Every cluster has nodes. Clustered LVM VG assumes you have > cluster. Why not be cluster-aware in tools then? The changes I'm making move away from remote command execution within lvm itself because it's poor a design and complicates things tremendously for a dubious feature. Also, it would not fit well at all with sanlock which I'm adding support for. There are much better ways of doing remote commands.