All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] sched: don't consider other cpus in our group in case of NEWLY_IDLE
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 15:52:18 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130320065218.GB11672@lge.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1363702857.22553.50.camel@laptop>

On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 03:20:57PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-02-14 at 14:48 +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> > Commit 88b8dac0 makes load_balance() consider other cpus in its group,
> > regardless of idle type. When we do NEWLY_IDLE balancing, we should not
> > consider it, because a motivation of NEWLY_IDLE balancing is to turn
> > this cpu to non idle state if needed. This is not the case of other cpus.
> > So, change code not to consider other cpus for NEWLY_IDLE balancing.
> > 
> > With this patch, assign 'if (pulled_task) this_rq->idle_stamp = 0'
> > in idle_balance() is corrected, because NEWLY_IDLE balancing doesn't
> > consider other cpus. Assigning to 'this_rq->idle_stamp' is now valid.
> > 
> > Cc: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
> 
> Fair enough, good catch.
> 
> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
> 
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > index 0c6aaf6..97498f4 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > @@ -5016,8 +5016,15 @@ static int load_balance(int this_cpu, struct rq *this_rq,
> >  		.cpus		= cpus,
> >  	};
> >  
> > +	/* For NEWLY_IDLE load_balancing, we don't need to consider
> > +	 * other cpus in our group */
> > +	if (idle == CPU_NEWLY_IDLE) {
> > +		env.dst_grpmask = NULL;
> > +		max_lb_iterations = 0;
> 
> Just a small nit; I don't think we'll ever get to evaluate
> max_lb_iterations when !dst_grpmask. So strictly speaking its
> superfluous to touch it.

Okay. In next spin, I will remove it and add a comment here.

Thanks.

> 
> > +	} else {
> > +		max_lb_iterations = cpumask_weight(env.dst_grpmask);
> > +	}
> >  	cpumask_copy(cpus, cpu_active_mask);
> > -	max_lb_iterations = cpumask_weight(env.dst_grpmask);
> >  
> >  	schedstat_inc(sd, lb_count[idle]);
> >  
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

  reply	other threads:[~2013-03-20  6:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-02-14  5:48 [PATCH 0/8] correct load_balance() Joonsoo Kim
2013-02-14  5:48 ` [PATCH 1/8] sched: change position of resched_cpu() in load_balance() Joonsoo Kim
2013-03-19 12:59   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-02-14  5:48 ` [PATCH 2/8] sched: explicitly cpu_idle_type checking in rebalance_domains() Joonsoo Kim
2013-03-19 14:02   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-03-20  6:48     ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-02-14  5:48 ` [PATCH 3/8] sched: don't consider other cpus in our group in case of NEWLY_IDLE Joonsoo Kim
2013-03-19 14:20   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-03-20  6:52     ` Joonsoo Kim [this message]
2013-02-14  5:48 ` [PATCH 4/8] sched: clean up move_task() and move_one_task() Joonsoo Kim
2013-03-19 14:30   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-03-20  7:33     ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-03-20 11:11       ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-03-20 13:42         ` JoonSoo Kim
2013-03-20 11:16       ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-03-20 12:07         ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-02-14  5:48 ` [PATCH 5/8] sched: move up affinity check to mitigate useless redoing overhead Joonsoo Kim
2013-02-14  5:48 ` [PATCH 6/8] sched: rename load_balance_tmpmask to load_balance_cpu_active Joonsoo Kim
2013-03-19 15:01   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-03-20  7:35     ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-02-14  5:48 ` [PATCH 7/8] sched: prevent to re-select dst-cpu in load_balance() Joonsoo Kim
2013-03-19 15:05   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-03-20  7:43     ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-03-20 12:38       ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-03-20 13:48         ` JoonSoo Kim
2013-02-14  5:48 ` [PATCH 8/8] sched: reset lb_env when redo " Joonsoo Kim
2013-03-19 15:21   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-03-20  8:13     ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-02-25  4:56 ` [PATCH 0/8] correct load_balance() Joonsoo Kim
2013-03-19  5:11   ` Joonsoo Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130320065218.GB11672@lge.com \
    --to=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.