All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: fix ext4_evict_inode() racing against workqueue processing code
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 09:37:51 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130320133751.GC12865@thunk.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130320132223.GD13294@quack.suse.cz>

On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 02:22:23PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> > +	if (work_pending(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_unwritten_work))
> > +		flush_work(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_unwritten_work);
> >  }
>   Won't it be more logical to use cancel_work_sync() here?

Hmm.... yes, probably, but then ext4_ioend_wait() can only be safely
used by ext4_evict_inode().  I'll make the change, but I'll also make
a comment to this effect.  (No one else is using it now, but if there
was ever a need to use it while the inode was in use, using
cancel_work_sync() would be highly dagernous/racy.  That being said, I
can't really think of a good use case other than evict_inode path, so
it seems fine to make this change.)

					- Ted

  reply	other threads:[~2013-03-20 13:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-03-20  1:29 [PATCH] ext4: fix ext4_evict_inode() racing against workqueue processing code Theodore Ts'o
2013-03-20  1:38 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-03-20 13:22 ` Jan Kara
2013-03-20 13:37   ` Theodore Ts'o [this message]
2013-03-20 13:42     ` Jan Kara
2013-03-20 13:51       ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-03-20 14:14 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-03-20 14:45   ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-03-20 20:13     ` Jan Kara
2013-03-26  5:52     ` Zheng Liu
2013-03-26  5:55       ` Zheng Liu
2013-03-26 20:34       ` Jan Kara
2013-03-27  3:13         ` Zheng Liu
2013-03-29  7:32         ` Zheng Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130320133751.GC12865@thunk.org \
    --to=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.