From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp2-g21.free.fr (smtp2-g21.free.fr [212.27.42.2]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80EC8E0136C for ; Wed, 20 Mar 2013 09:43:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e6520eb (pac33-2-82-240-38-71.fbx.proxad.net [82.240.38.71]) (Authenticated sender: eukrea) by smtp2-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6543F4B02A7; Wed, 20 Mar 2013 17:43:36 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 17:43:34 +0100 From: Eric =?UTF-8?B?QsOpbmFyZA==?= To: Ashwin Kirpalani Message-ID: <20130320174334.26f90b46@e6520eb> In-Reply-To: References: <20130320162406.6a21974e@e6520eb> Organization: =?UTF-8?B?RXVrcsOpYQ==?= Electromatique X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.13; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: MT9T111/MT9T112 aptina camera driver in linux-imx X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 16:43:44 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Ashwin, Le Wed, 20 Mar 2013 12:36:19 -0400, Ashwin Kirpalani a =C3=A9crit : > ahhh...ok so I think I will have to port the mt9t112 driver to freescale's > way of doing things, namely in the drivers/media/video/mxc/capture since > freescale is not using soc_camera. >=20 True. > On a somewhat related question, what is this "imx-devel" branch about?: > https://github.com/RobertCNelson/imx-devel/branches > I see all kinds of references to imx-devel and v3.x.y.imx-devel here. How > come this is all the way up to 3.8 while Freescale is still on 3.0.35. > Something doesn't seem right! >=20 Freescale's official kernel is based on 3.0.35 (and oyu are lucky, i.MX53 is stuck at 2.6.35 ;-( , but community and Linaro's people are working on mainline (which doesn't have all the drivers the official kernel has), so depending on the peripherals you need, you could run a mainline kernel on your i.MX CPU. Eric