From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from bear.ext.ti.com (bear.ext.ti.com [192.94.94.41]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED224E00741 for ; Wed, 20 Mar 2013 11:58:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dlelxv30.itg.ti.com ([172.17.2.17]) by bear.ext.ti.com (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id r2KIvmK4002930; Wed, 20 Mar 2013 13:57:48 -0500 Received: from DLEE70.ent.ti.com (dlee70.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.113]) by dlelxv30.itg.ti.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r2KIvmr9016760; Wed, 20 Mar 2013 13:57:48 -0500 Received: from dlelxv22.itg.ti.com (172.17.1.197) by DLEE70.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.113) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.3; Wed, 20 Mar 2013 13:57:47 -0500 Received: from localhost ([158.218.102.158]) by dlelxv22.itg.ti.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r2KIvl9g016205; Wed, 20 Mar 2013 13:57:47 -0500 Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 14:57:47 -0400 From: Denys Dmytriyenko To: "Robert P. J. Day" Message-ID: <20130320185747.GY32759@edge> References: <20130319172138.GQ32759@edge> <5148A9B4.5060702@comcast.net> <20130319182747.GH14761@denix.org> <5149C666.7040306@comcast.net> <20130320151759.GP14761@denix.org> <5149F665.9090204@comcast.net> <20130320175415.GW32759@edge> <5149FD74.3030906@comcast.net> <20130320182722.GX32759@edge> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: "meta-ti@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: Is this the correct list for AM3517 EVM questions? X-BeenThere: meta-ti@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-ti layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 18:58:53 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 02:45:17PM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > On Wed, 20 Mar 2013, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > > ... snip ... > > > If you are using poky-danny as a base, you need to use "danny" > > branch of meta-ti to match the versions. > > i ordered that very AM3517 exp kit this morning and, while it's > in transit, i'm building a core-image-minimal for it. should i expect > success if i use the absolute latest "git pull"s of everything? > > i'm aware of the recipe masking issue and the mesa-dri version thing > so i won't trip over that. so far, the "fetchall" worked and i'm > currently on "running tasks (191 of 1591)" of the build itself. > > is there any reason to think this shouldn't finish? thanks. http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.embedded.yocto.meta-ti/1661 -- Denys