All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Cc: Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>,
	Valdis Kletnieks <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	Zlatko Calusic <zcalusic@bitsync.net>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	dormando <dormando@rydia.net>,
	Satoru Moriya <satoru.moriya@hds.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/10] mm: vmscan: Move logic from balance_pgdat() to kswapd_shrink_zone()
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 18:13:56 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130321181356.GO1878@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130321171804.GW6094@dhcp22.suse.cz>

On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 06:18:04PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Sun 17-03-13 13:04:16, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * Kswapd reclaims only single pages with compaction enabled. Trying
> > +	 * too hard to reclaim until contiguous free pages have become
> > +	 * available can hurt performance by evicting too much useful data
> > +	 * from memory. Do not reclaim more than needed for compaction.
> > +	 */
> > +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_COMPACTION) && sc->order &&
> > +			compaction_suitable(zone, sc->order) !=
> > +				COMPACT_SKIPPED)
> > +		testorder = 0;
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * We put equal pressure on every zone, unless one zone has way too
> > +	 * many pages free already. The "too many pages" is defined as the
> > +	 * high wmark plus a "gap" where the gap is either the low
> > +	 * watermark or 1% of the zone, whichever is smaller.
> > +	 */
> > +	balance_gap = min(low_wmark_pages(zone),
> > +		(zone->managed_pages + KSWAPD_ZONE_BALANCE_GAP_RATIO-1) /
> > +		KSWAPD_ZONE_BALANCE_GAP_RATIO);
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * If there is no low memory pressure or the zone is balanced then no
> > +	 * reclaim is necessary
> > +	 */
> > +	lowmem_pressure = (buffer_heads_over_limit && is_highmem(zone));
> > +	if (!(lowmem_pressure || !zone_balanced(zone, testorder,
> > +						balance_gap, classzone_idx)))
> 
> if (!lowmem_pressure && zone_balanced) would be less cryptic I guess
> 

It would.

> > +		return true;
> > +
> >  	shrink_zone(zone, sc);
> >  
> >  	/*
> > @@ -2689,6 +2724,16 @@ static bool kswapd_shrink_zone(struct zone *zone,
> >  
> >  	zone_clear_flag(zone, ZONE_WRITEBACK);
> >  
> > +	/*
> > +	 * If a zone reaches its high watermark, consider it to be no longer
> > +	 * congested. It's possible there are dirty pages backed by congested
> > +	 * BDIs but as pressure is relieved, speculatively avoid congestion
> > +	 * waits.
> > +	 */
> > +	if (!zone->all_unreclaimable &&
> > +	    zone_balanced(zone, testorder, 0, classzone_idx))
> > +		zone_clear_flag(zone, ZONE_CONGESTED);
> > +
> >  	return sc->nr_scanned >= sc->nr_to_reclaim;
> >  }
> >  
> > @@ -2821,8 +2866,6 @@ static unsigned long balance_pgdat(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order,
> >  		 */
> >  		for (i = 0; i <= end_zone; i++) {
> >  			struct zone *zone = pgdat->node_zones + i;
> > -			int testorder;
> > -			unsigned long balance_gap;
> >  
> >  			if (!populated_zone(zone))
> >  				continue;
> > @@ -2843,61 +2886,16 @@ static unsigned long balance_pgdat(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order,
> >  			sc.nr_reclaimed += nr_soft_reclaimed;
> >  
> >  			/*
> > -			 * We put equal pressure on every zone, unless
> > -			 * one zone has way too many pages free
> > -			 * already. The "too many pages" is defined
> > -			 * as the high wmark plus a "gap" where the
> > -			 * gap is either the low watermark or 1%
> > -			 * of the zone, whichever is smaller.
> > -			 */
> > -			balance_gap = min(low_wmark_pages(zone),
> > -				(zone->managed_pages +
> > -					KSWAPD_ZONE_BALANCE_GAP_RATIO-1) /
> > -				KSWAPD_ZONE_BALANCE_GAP_RATIO);
> > -			/*
> > -			 * Kswapd reclaims only single pages with compaction
> > -			 * enabled. Trying too hard to reclaim until contiguous
> > -			 * free pages have become available can hurt performance
> > -			 * by evicting too much useful data from memory.
> > -			 * Do not reclaim more than needed for compaction.
> > +			 * There should be no need to raise the scanning
> > +			 * priority if enough pages are already being scanned
> > +			 * that that high watermark would be met at 100%
> > +			 * efficiency.
> >  			 */
> > -			testorder = order;
> > -			if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_COMPACTION) && order &&
> > -					compaction_suitable(zone, order) !=
> > -						COMPACT_SKIPPED)
> > -				testorder = 0;
> > -
> > -			if ((buffer_heads_over_limit && is_highmem_idx(i)) ||
> > -			    !zone_balanced(zone, testorder,
> > -					   balance_gap, end_zone)) {
> > -				/*
> > -				 * There should be no need to raise the
> > -				 * scanning priority if enough pages are
> > -				 * already being scanned that that high
> > -				 * watermark would be met at 100% efficiency.
> > -				 */
> > -				if (kswapd_shrink_zone(zone, &sc,
> > +			if (kswapd_shrink_zone(zone, end_zone, &sc,
> >  						lru_pages, shrinking_slab))
> >  					raise_priority = false;
> >  
> > -				nr_to_reclaim += sc.nr_to_reclaim;
> > -			}
> > -
> > -			if (zone->all_unreclaimable) {
> > -				if (end_zone && end_zone == i)
> > -					end_zone--;
> > -				continue;
> > -			}
> > -
> > -			if (zone_balanced(zone, testorder, 0, end_zone))
> > -				/*
> > -				 * If a zone reaches its high watermark,
> > -				 * consider it to be no longer congested. It's
> > -				 * possible there are dirty pages backed by
> > -				 * congested BDIs but as pressure is relieved,
> > -				 * speculatively avoid congestion waits
> > -				 */
> > -				zone_clear_flag(zone, ZONE_CONGESTED);
> > +			nr_to_reclaim += sc.nr_to_reclaim;
> >  		}
> 
> nr_to_reclaim is updated if the zone is balanced an no reclaim is done
> which break compaction condition AFAICS.
> 

True, it only makes sense to account for the pages it actually attempted
to reclaim. Thanks.

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Cc: Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>,
	Valdis Kletnieks <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	Zlatko Calusic <zcalusic@bitsync.net>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	dormando <dormando@rydia.net>,
	Satoru Moriya <satoru.moriya@hds.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/10] mm: vmscan: Move logic from balance_pgdat() to kswapd_shrink_zone()
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 18:13:56 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130321181356.GO1878@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130321171804.GW6094@dhcp22.suse.cz>

On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 06:18:04PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Sun 17-03-13 13:04:16, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * Kswapd reclaims only single pages with compaction enabled. Trying
> > +	 * too hard to reclaim until contiguous free pages have become
> > +	 * available can hurt performance by evicting too much useful data
> > +	 * from memory. Do not reclaim more than needed for compaction.
> > +	 */
> > +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_COMPACTION) && sc->order &&
> > +			compaction_suitable(zone, sc->order) !=
> > +				COMPACT_SKIPPED)
> > +		testorder = 0;
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * We put equal pressure on every zone, unless one zone has way too
> > +	 * many pages free already. The "too many pages" is defined as the
> > +	 * high wmark plus a "gap" where the gap is either the low
> > +	 * watermark or 1% of the zone, whichever is smaller.
> > +	 */
> > +	balance_gap = min(low_wmark_pages(zone),
> > +		(zone->managed_pages + KSWAPD_ZONE_BALANCE_GAP_RATIO-1) /
> > +		KSWAPD_ZONE_BALANCE_GAP_RATIO);
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * If there is no low memory pressure or the zone is balanced then no
> > +	 * reclaim is necessary
> > +	 */
> > +	lowmem_pressure = (buffer_heads_over_limit && is_highmem(zone));
> > +	if (!(lowmem_pressure || !zone_balanced(zone, testorder,
> > +						balance_gap, classzone_idx)))
> 
> if (!lowmem_pressure && zone_balanced) would be less cryptic I guess
> 

It would.

> > +		return true;
> > +
> >  	shrink_zone(zone, sc);
> >  
> >  	/*
> > @@ -2689,6 +2724,16 @@ static bool kswapd_shrink_zone(struct zone *zone,
> >  
> >  	zone_clear_flag(zone, ZONE_WRITEBACK);
> >  
> > +	/*
> > +	 * If a zone reaches its high watermark, consider it to be no longer
> > +	 * congested. It's possible there are dirty pages backed by congested
> > +	 * BDIs but as pressure is relieved, speculatively avoid congestion
> > +	 * waits.
> > +	 */
> > +	if (!zone->all_unreclaimable &&
> > +	    zone_balanced(zone, testorder, 0, classzone_idx))
> > +		zone_clear_flag(zone, ZONE_CONGESTED);
> > +
> >  	return sc->nr_scanned >= sc->nr_to_reclaim;
> >  }
> >  
> > @@ -2821,8 +2866,6 @@ static unsigned long balance_pgdat(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order,
> >  		 */
> >  		for (i = 0; i <= end_zone; i++) {
> >  			struct zone *zone = pgdat->node_zones + i;
> > -			int testorder;
> > -			unsigned long balance_gap;
> >  
> >  			if (!populated_zone(zone))
> >  				continue;
> > @@ -2843,61 +2886,16 @@ static unsigned long balance_pgdat(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order,
> >  			sc.nr_reclaimed += nr_soft_reclaimed;
> >  
> >  			/*
> > -			 * We put equal pressure on every zone, unless
> > -			 * one zone has way too many pages free
> > -			 * already. The "too many pages" is defined
> > -			 * as the high wmark plus a "gap" where the
> > -			 * gap is either the low watermark or 1%
> > -			 * of the zone, whichever is smaller.
> > -			 */
> > -			balance_gap = min(low_wmark_pages(zone),
> > -				(zone->managed_pages +
> > -					KSWAPD_ZONE_BALANCE_GAP_RATIO-1) /
> > -				KSWAPD_ZONE_BALANCE_GAP_RATIO);
> > -			/*
> > -			 * Kswapd reclaims only single pages with compaction
> > -			 * enabled. Trying too hard to reclaim until contiguous
> > -			 * free pages have become available can hurt performance
> > -			 * by evicting too much useful data from memory.
> > -			 * Do not reclaim more than needed for compaction.
> > +			 * There should be no need to raise the scanning
> > +			 * priority if enough pages are already being scanned
> > +			 * that that high watermark would be met at 100%
> > +			 * efficiency.
> >  			 */
> > -			testorder = order;
> > -			if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_COMPACTION) && order &&
> > -					compaction_suitable(zone, order) !=
> > -						COMPACT_SKIPPED)
> > -				testorder = 0;
> > -
> > -			if ((buffer_heads_over_limit && is_highmem_idx(i)) ||
> > -			    !zone_balanced(zone, testorder,
> > -					   balance_gap, end_zone)) {
> > -				/*
> > -				 * There should be no need to raise the
> > -				 * scanning priority if enough pages are
> > -				 * already being scanned that that high
> > -				 * watermark would be met at 100% efficiency.
> > -				 */
> > -				if (kswapd_shrink_zone(zone, &sc,
> > +			if (kswapd_shrink_zone(zone, end_zone, &sc,
> >  						lru_pages, shrinking_slab))
> >  					raise_priority = false;
> >  
> > -				nr_to_reclaim += sc.nr_to_reclaim;
> > -			}
> > -
> > -			if (zone->all_unreclaimable) {
> > -				if (end_zone && end_zone == i)
> > -					end_zone--;
> > -				continue;
> > -			}
> > -
> > -			if (zone_balanced(zone, testorder, 0, end_zone))
> > -				/*
> > -				 * If a zone reaches its high watermark,
> > -				 * consider it to be no longer congested. It's
> > -				 * possible there are dirty pages backed by
> > -				 * congested BDIs but as pressure is relieved,
> > -				 * speculatively avoid congestion waits
> > -				 */
> > -				zone_clear_flag(zone, ZONE_CONGESTED);
> > +			nr_to_reclaim += sc.nr_to_reclaim;
> >  		}
> 
> nr_to_reclaim is updated if the zone is balanced an no reclaim is done
> which break compaction condition AFAICS.
> 

True, it only makes sense to account for the pages it actually attempted
to reclaim. Thanks.

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs

  reply	other threads:[~2013-03-21 18:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 260+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-03-17 13:04 [RFC PATCH 0/8] Reduce system disruption due to kswapd Mel Gorman
2013-03-17 13:04 ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-17 13:04 ` [PATCH 01/10] mm: vmscan: Limit the number of pages kswapd reclaims at each priority Mel Gorman
2013-03-17 13:04   ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-18 23:53   ` Simon Jeons
2013-03-18 23:53     ` Simon Jeons
2013-03-19  9:55     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-19  9:55       ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-19 10:16       ` Simon Jeons
2013-03-19 10:16         ` Simon Jeons
2013-03-19 10:59         ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-19 10:59           ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-20 16:18   ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-20 16:18     ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-21  0:52     ` Rik van Riel
2013-03-21  0:52       ` Rik van Riel
2013-03-22  0:08       ` Will Huck
2013-03-22  0:08         ` Will Huck
2013-03-21  9:47     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-21  9:47       ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-21 12:59       ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-21 12:59         ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-21  0:51   ` Rik van Riel
2013-03-21  0:51     ` Rik van Riel
2013-03-21 15:57   ` Johannes Weiner
2013-03-21 15:57     ` Johannes Weiner
2013-03-21 16:47     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-21 16:47       ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-22  0:05     ` Will Huck
2013-03-22  0:05       ` Will Huck
2013-03-22  3:52       ` Rik van Riel
2013-03-22  3:52         ` Rik van Riel
2013-03-22  3:56         ` Will Huck
2013-03-22  3:56           ` Will Huck
2013-03-22  4:59           ` Will Huck
2013-03-22  4:59             ` Will Huck
2013-03-22 13:01             ` Rik van Riel
2013-03-22 13:01               ` Rik van Riel
2013-04-05  0:05               ` Will Huck
2013-04-05  0:05                 ` Will Huck
2013-04-07  7:32                 ` Will Huck
2013-04-07  7:32                   ` Will Huck
2013-04-07  7:35                 ` Will Huck
2013-04-07  7:35                   ` Will Huck
2013-04-11  5:54         ` Will Huck
2013-04-11  5:54           ` Will Huck
2013-04-11  5:58         ` Will Huck
2013-04-11  5:58           ` Will Huck
2013-04-12  5:46           ` Ric Mason
2013-04-12  5:46             ` Ric Mason
2013-04-12  9:34             ` Mel Gorman
2013-04-12  9:34               ` Mel Gorman
2013-04-12 13:40               ` Rik van Riel
2013-04-12 13:40                 ` Rik van Riel
2013-03-25  9:07   ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-25  9:07     ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-25  9:13     ` Jiri Slaby
2013-03-25  9:13       ` Jiri Slaby
2013-03-28 22:31       ` Jiri Slaby
2013-03-28 22:31         ` Jiri Slaby
2013-03-29  8:22         ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-29  8:22           ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-30 22:07           ` Jiri Slaby
2013-03-30 22:07             ` Jiri Slaby
2013-04-02 11:15             ` Mel Gorman
2013-04-02 11:15               ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-17 13:04 ` [PATCH 02/10] mm: vmscan: Obey proportional scanning requirements for kswapd Mel Gorman
2013-03-17 13:04   ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-17 14:39   ` Andi Kleen
2013-03-17 14:39     ` Andi Kleen
2013-03-17 15:08     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-17 15:08       ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-21  1:10   ` Rik van Riel
2013-03-21  1:10     ` Rik van Riel
2013-03-21  9:54     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-21  9:54       ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-21 14:01   ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-21 14:01     ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-21 14:31     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-21 14:31       ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-21 15:07       ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-21 15:07         ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-21 15:34         ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-21 15:34           ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-22  7:54           ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-22  7:54             ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-22  8:37             ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-22  8:37               ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-22 10:04               ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-22 10:04                 ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-22 10:47                 ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-22 10:47                   ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-21 16:25   ` Johannes Weiner
2013-03-21 16:25     ` Johannes Weiner
2013-03-21 18:02     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-21 18:02       ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-22 16:53       ` Johannes Weiner
2013-03-22 16:53         ` Johannes Weiner
2013-03-22 18:25         ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-22 18:25           ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-22 19:09           ` Johannes Weiner
2013-03-22 19:09             ` Johannes Weiner
2013-03-22 19:46             ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-22 19:46               ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-17 13:04 ` [PATCH 03/10] mm: vmscan: Flatten kswapd priority loop Mel Gorman
2013-03-17 13:04   ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-17 14:36   ` Andi Kleen
2013-03-17 14:36     ` Andi Kleen
2013-03-17 15:09     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-17 15:09       ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-18  7:02   ` Hillf Danton
2013-03-19 10:01     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-18 23:58   ` Simon Jeons
2013-03-18 23:58     ` Simon Jeons
2013-03-19 10:12     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-19 10:12       ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-19  3:08   ` Simon Jeons
2013-03-19  3:08     ` Simon Jeons
2013-03-19  8:23     ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-19  8:23       ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-19 10:14     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-19 10:14       ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-19 10:26       ` Simon Jeons
2013-03-19 10:26         ` Simon Jeons
2013-03-19 11:01         ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-19 11:01           ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-21 14:54   ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-21 14:54     ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-21 15:26     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-21 15:26       ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-21 15:38       ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-21 15:38         ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-17 13:04 ` [PATCH 04/10] mm: vmscan: Decide whether to compact the pgdat based on reclaim progress Mel Gorman
2013-03-17 13:04   ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-18 11:11   ` Wanpeng Li
2013-03-19 10:19     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-19 10:19       ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-18 11:11   ` Wanpeng Li
2013-03-18 11:35   ` Hillf Danton
2013-03-18 11:35     ` Hillf Danton
2013-03-19 10:27     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-19 10:27       ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-21 15:32   ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-21 15:32     ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-21 15:47     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-21 15:47       ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-21 15:50       ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-21 15:50         ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-17 13:04 ` [PATCH 05/10] mm: vmscan: Do not allow kswapd to scan at maximum priority Mel Gorman
2013-03-17 13:04   ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-21  1:20   ` Rik van Riel
2013-03-21  1:20     ` Rik van Riel
2013-03-21 10:12     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-21 10:12       ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-21 12:30       ` Rik van Riel
2013-03-21 12:30         ` Rik van Riel
2013-03-21 15:48   ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-21 15:48     ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-17 13:04 ` [PATCH 06/10] mm: vmscan: Have kswapd writeback pages based on dirty pages encountered, not priority Mel Gorman
2013-03-17 13:04   ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-17 14:42   ` Andi Kleen
2013-03-17 14:42     ` Andi Kleen
2013-03-17 15:11     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-17 15:11       ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-21 17:53       ` Rik van Riel
2013-03-21 17:53         ` Rik van Riel
2013-03-21 18:15         ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-21 18:15           ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-21 18:21           ` Rik van Riel
2013-03-21 18:21             ` Rik van Riel
2013-03-18 11:08   ` Wanpeng Li
2013-03-19 10:35     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-19 10:35       ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-18 11:08   ` Wanpeng Li
2013-03-17 13:04 ` [PATCH 07/10] mm: vmscan: Block kswapd if it is encountering pages under writeback Mel Gorman
2013-03-17 13:04   ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-17 14:49   ` Andi Kleen
2013-03-17 14:49     ` Andi Kleen
2013-03-17 15:19     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-17 15:19       ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-17 15:40       ` Andi Kleen
2013-03-17 15:40         ` Andi Kleen
2013-03-19 11:06         ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-19 11:06           ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-18 11:37   ` Simon Jeons
2013-03-18 11:37     ` Simon Jeons
2013-03-19 10:57     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-19 10:57       ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-18 11:58   ` Wanpeng Li
2013-03-19 10:58     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-19 10:58       ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-18 11:58   ` Wanpeng Li
2013-03-21 16:32   ` [PATCH 07/10 -v2r1] " Michal Hocko
2013-03-21 16:32     ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-21 18:42   ` [PATCH 07/10] " Rik van Riel
2013-03-21 18:42     ` Rik van Riel
2013-03-22  8:27     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-22  8:27       ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-17 13:04 ` [PATCH 08/10] mm: vmscan: Have kswapd shrink slab only once per priority Mel Gorman
2013-03-17 13:04   ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-17 14:53   ` Andi Kleen
2013-03-17 14:53     ` Andi Kleen
2013-03-21 16:47   ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-21 16:47     ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-21 19:47   ` Rik van Riel
2013-03-21 19:47     ` Rik van Riel
2013-04-09  6:53   ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-04-09  6:53     ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-04-09  8:41     ` Simon Jeons
2013-04-09  8:41       ` Simon Jeons
2013-04-09 11:13     ` Mel Gorman
2013-04-09 11:13       ` Mel Gorman
2013-04-10  1:07       ` Dave Chinner
2013-04-10  1:07         ` Dave Chinner
2013-04-10  5:23         ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-04-10  5:23           ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-04-11  9:53         ` Mel Gorman
2013-04-11  9:53           ` Mel Gorman
2013-04-10  5:21       ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-04-10  5:21         ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-04-11 10:01         ` Mel Gorman
2013-04-11 10:01           ` Mel Gorman
2013-04-11 10:29           ` Ric Mason
2013-04-11 10:29             ` Ric Mason
2013-03-17 13:04 ` [PATCH 09/10] mm: vmscan: Check if kswapd should writepage " Mel Gorman
2013-03-17 13:04   ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-21 16:58   ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-21 16:58     ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-21 18:07     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-21 18:07       ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-21 19:52   ` Rik van Riel
2013-03-21 19:52     ` Rik van Riel
2013-03-17 13:04 ` [PATCH 10/10] mm: vmscan: Move logic from balance_pgdat() to kswapd_shrink_zone() Mel Gorman
2013-03-17 13:04   ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-17 14:55   ` Andi Kleen
2013-03-17 14:55     ` Andi Kleen
2013-03-17 15:25     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-17 15:25       ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-21 17:18   ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-21 17:18     ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-21 18:13     ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2013-03-21 18:13       ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-21 10:44 ` [RFC PATCH 0/8] Reduce system disruption due to kswapd Damien Wyart
2013-03-21 10:54   ` Zlatko Calusic
2013-03-21 11:48     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-21 11:20   ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-22 14:37 ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-22 14:37   ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-24 19:00 ` Jiri Slaby
2013-03-24 19:00   ` Jiri Slaby
2013-03-25  8:17   ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-25  8:17     ` Michal Hocko
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-04-09 11:06 [PATCH 0/10] Reduce system disruption due to kswapd V2 Mel Gorman
2013-04-09 11:07 ` [PATCH 10/10] mm: vmscan: Move logic from balance_pgdat() to kswapd_shrink_zone() Mel Gorman
2013-04-09 11:07   ` Mel Gorman
2013-04-12  2:56   ` Rik van Riel
2013-04-12  2:56     ` Rik van Riel
2013-04-11 19:57 [PATCH 0/10] Reduce system disruption due to kswapd V3 Mel Gorman
2013-04-11 19:57 ` [PATCH 10/10] mm: vmscan: Move logic from balance_pgdat() to kswapd_shrink_zone() Mel Gorman
2013-04-11 19:57   ` Mel Gorman
2013-04-18 16:56   ` Johannes Weiner
2013-04-18 16:56     ` Johannes Weiner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130321181356.GO1878@suse.de \
    --to=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
    --cc=dormando@rydia.net \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=satoru.moriya@hds.com \
    --cc=zcalusic@bitsync.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.