From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann) Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 13:34:07 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 0/9] More ux500 multiplatform stuff In-Reply-To: References: <1363866553-15054-1-git-send-email-linus.walleij@stericsson.com> <1363902674-6456-1-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> Message-ID: <201303221334.07330.arnd@arndb.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Friday 22 March 2013, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 10:51 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > This is > > what I came up with, on top of your patches. Feel free to take what > > you need if you don't already have the same patches. > > > > I've successfully built "allmodconfig" with all the other v6/v7 > > platforms enabled as well. > > Unfortunately the platform stops booting after > 2/9 "ARM: ux500: split out prcmu initialization" > so I will look closer at this. Yes, I can see how it has potential for introducing bugs. I hope it's something obvious that you can find easily. > This patch: > "ARM: ux500: kill mach/hardware.h some more" > I will squash into the actual removal patch, it's just > some sloppy work by me :-/ Yes, I expected that. > I will try to move some of the patches to the > front of the series so we only have the tricky stuff to > fix. Ok. > And there are some non-bisectable patches due to the > driver in staging (which was put there because Synaptics would > submit another driver "real soon now" and that was something like > two years ago), so I might have to squash some of them together to one. What breaks bisection here? The "[PATCH 5/9] staging: ste_rmi4: kill platform_data hack" patch should be independent of everything else, it just touches more files than we'd like. Arnd