From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759092Ab3CYXcR (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Mar 2013 19:32:17 -0400 Received: from mail-pb0-f45.google.com ([209.85.160.45]:49092 "EHLO mail-pb0-f45.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753584Ab3CYXcP (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Mar 2013 19:32:15 -0400 Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 16:32:13 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Chen Gang Cc: Mark Brown , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , "nico@linaro.org" , Arnd Bergmann , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] include/linux/platform_data: beautify code, 'inline' is better in front of 'void' Message-ID: <20130325233213.GA29245@kroah.com> References: <514FB826.9020302@asianux.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <514FB826.9020302@asianux.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 10:36:22AM +0800, Chen Gang wrote: > > better to let 'inline' in front of 'void' Why? What does this fix?