From: thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com (Thomas Petazzoni)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: mvebu: Device bus driver resurrection
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 14:05:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130326140525.0167bd72@skate> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130326124337.GD2454@localhost>
Hello,
On Tue, 26 Mar 2013 09:43:38 -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> Now that we've all agreed on a mvebu mbus driver (or a first version of it)
> I'd like to resurrect the Device Bus driver.
>
> As far as I can remember, the last things said about this driver were:
>
> * The timing parameters should be in {nano,pico,etc} seconds,
> instead of ticks.
>
> * Although not everyone agreed, this driver was a good thing to have
> so we no longer depend on the bootloader setting these parameters.
>
> * The address decoding windows should *not* be setup by this driver,
> but rather be described in the device tree itself.
>
> If anyone has aditional comments, please speak your mind.
>
> My plan is to address all of the above comments, and send a v2 soon.
>
> However, since we do not yet describe the address windows at the device tree,
> the plan is to do window allocation/release in this devbus driver
> **only as a temporal solution**.
>
> Once the address decoding windows are properly described in the DTS,
> we can remove that handling from the driver for good.
>
> Does this sound sane enough?
Of course I do agree with your proposal, and I'd like to say that I'm
committed to work on a proper DT binding for the mvebu-mbus driver so
that the static windows can ultimately be defined in the Device Tree.
So what Ezequiel presents here as a temporary solution really is.
Thanks,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-26 13:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-26 12:43 mvebu: Device bus driver resurrection Ezequiel Garcia
2013-03-26 13:05 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2013-03-26 16:45 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-03-26 16:55 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-04-05 21:26 ` Ezequiel Garcia
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130326140525.0167bd72@skate \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.