From: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@canonical.com>
To: PaX Team <pageexec@freemail.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com, Emese Revfy <re.emese@gmail.com>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@canonical.com>,
Julien Tinnes <jln@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 150/150] kernel/signal.c: use __ARCH_HAS_SA_RESTORER instead of SA_RESTORER
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 15:16:07 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130327151607.GA17221@hercules> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <515307E5.8858.4BC860B3@pageexec.freemail.hu>
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 03:53:25PM +0100, PaX Team wrote:
> sorry if you got this twice, had smtpd problems...
>
> On 26 Mar 2013 at 15:20, Luis Henriques wrote:
>
> > 3.5.7.9 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> >
> > ------------------
> >
> > From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> >
> > commit 522cff142d7d2f9230839c9e1f21a4d8bcc22a4a upstream.
> >
> > __ARCH_HAS_SA_RESTORER is the preferred conditional for use in 3.9 and
> > later kernels, per Kees.
>
> does __ARCH_HAS_SA_RESTORER exist in the 3.5 stable series at all? i thought it
> was new to 3.9...
You're right, __ARCH_HAS_SA_RESTORER has been added on 3.9 only.
However, due to build failures for some archs (mips, ia64, ...) using
the upstream 2ca39528c01a933f6689cd6505ce65bd6d68a530 commit, Ben
Hutchings has cooked a patch that adds this definition to stable
series.
This patch is currently under review for the 3.5 kernel:
[PATCH 149/150] signal: Define __ARCH_HAS_SA_RESTORER so we know whether to clear sa_restorer
Cheers,
--
Luis
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-27 15:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-27 14:53 [PATCH 150/150] kernel/signal.c: use __ARCH_HAS_SA_RESTORER instead of SA_RESTORER PaX Team
2013-03-27 15:16 ` Luis Henriques [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-03-26 15:18 [ 3.5.y.z extended stable ] Linux 3.5.7.9 stable review Luis Henriques
2013-03-26 15:20 ` [PATCH 150/150] kernel/signal.c: use __ARCH_HAS_SA_RESTORER instead of SA_RESTORER Luis Henriques
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130327151607.GA17221@hercules \
--to=luis.henriques@canonical.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=jln@google.com \
--cc=kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=pageexec@freemail.hu \
--cc=re.emese@gmail.com \
--cc=serge.hallyn@canonical.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.