From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Jack Winter <jbh@alchemy.lu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: fold wait_for_atomic_us into wait_for_atomic
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 12:53:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130328105305.GJ4469@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1364466664-21037-1-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:31:04AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Since
>
> commit bcf9dcc1e6269fac674e41f25d007ff75f76e840
> Author: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Date: Sun Jul 15 09:42:38 2012 +0100
>
> drm/i915: Workaround hang with BSD and forcewake on SandyBridge
>
> and
>
> commit 0cc2764cc4a4bd73df55f8893c871778cf7ddd0f
> Author: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
> Date: Sat Sep 1 22:59:48 2012 -0700
>
> drm/i915: use cpu_relax() in wait_for_atomic
>
> these two macros are essentially the same, so unify them. We keep the
> _us version since it's a nice documentation for smaller timeouts.
>
> v2: Fixup time unit conversion, _wait_for takes ms (Ville).
>
> Cc: Jack Winter <jbh@alchemy.lu>
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 15 ++-------------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> index 54bc2ea..8e76f52f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> @@ -50,21 +50,10 @@
> ret__; \
> })
>
> -#define wait_for_atomic_us(COND, US) ({ \
> - unsigned long timeout__ = jiffies + usecs_to_jiffies(US); \
> - int ret__ = 0; \
> - while (!(COND)) { \
> - if (time_after(jiffies, timeout__)) { \
> - ret__ = -ETIMEDOUT; \
> - break; \
> - } \
> - cpu_relax(); \
> - } \
> - ret__; \
> -})
> -
> #define wait_for(COND, MS) _wait_for(COND, MS, 1)
> #define wait_for_atomic(COND, MS) _wait_for(COND, MS, 0)
> +#define wait_for_atomic_us(COND, US) _wait_for((COND), \
> + DIV_ROUND_UP((US), 1000), 0)
>
> #define KHz(x) (1000*x)
> #define MHz(x) KHz(1000*x)
> --
> 1.7.11.7
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-28 10:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-27 23:03 [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: fold wait_for_atomic_us into wait_for_atomic Daniel Vetter
2013-03-27 23:03 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: fix up _wait_for macro Daniel Vetter
2013-03-28 11:00 ` Ville Syrjälä
2013-03-28 15:41 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-03-28 10:32 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: fold wait_for_atomic_us into wait_for_atomic Ville Syrjälä
2013-03-28 10:31 ` [PATCH] " Daniel Vetter
2013-03-28 10:53 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130328105305.GJ4469@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jbh@alchemy.lu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.