From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Alex Hacker <hacker@epn.ru>
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2013 18:32:31 +0600
Subject: [ath9k-devel] Fixing the rate and rate relationship to OFDM
In-Reply-To: <CAJ-Vmo=kRZUK=F43fgp4oTW9F-i4uNCfP8u4Ot+NY+KbYvSUAA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <800E57B7-01E9-4239-AD8E-FE3E1058650E@aim.com>
	<000001ce2ba7$f401e220$dc05a660$@ac.kr>
	<F7E3CEE4-E878-44C3-BCF5-5B1A467E02F2@aim.com>
	<20130329052340.GA25353@infinet.ru>
	<25FCF6F7-9024-410C-94DD-4EE5237C043E@aim.com>
	<CAJ-Vmo=kRZUK=F43fgp4oTW9F-i4uNCfP8u4Ot+NY+KbYvSUAA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20130330123231.GA12621@infinet.ru>
List-Id: <ath9k-devel.lists.ath9k.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org

Hi Adrian,
You talking about real continuos signal like sine wave? I do not understand
why it needed. The method I'd offered is in full accordance with the 802.11
standard (and FCC I think) until CCA mechanism is not shut down. But I agree what
this kind of flood generator is terrible in the air.

Hi John,
I'd asked our RF engeneers who do FCC sertification tests. They agree - SA power
measurements are complex, slow and imprecise. But this methods is defined by FCC
specifications.

Best regards,
Alex.