From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alex Hacker Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2013 21:03:24 +0600 Subject: [ath9k-devel] Fixing the rate and rate relationship to OFDM In-Reply-To: References: <800E57B7-01E9-4239-AD8E-FE3E1058650E@aim.com> <000001ce2ba7$f401e220$dc05a660$@ac.kr> <20130329052340.GA25353@infinet.ru> <25FCF6F7-9024-410C-94DD-4EE5237C043E@aim.com> <20130330123231.GA12621@infinet.ru> Message-ID: <20130330150324.GA13043@infinet.ru> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org Hi Adrian, On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 06:27:53AM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: > Yup. Either is kinda frightening though! Even a back-to-back frame > transmission with CCA disabled is bordering on unhappiness. Yeah! Although it is all nothing compared to 1kW microwave oven or 500kW weather radar. :) > IIRC, there's ETSI requirements that tones are generated to test centre > frequency accuracies. I thought that the FCC had those too? I think yes in some way. I ask the authoritative people at the morinig they did both procedures. > Adrian Best regards, Alex.