From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: tegra: move to Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2013 17:14:50 +0000 Message-ID: <201304011714.50703.arnd@arndb.de> References: <1364602790-10759-1-git-send-email-swarren@wwwdotorg.org> <201303301413.26549.arnd@arndb.de> <5159B0FF.2010408@wwwdotorg.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <5159B0FF.2010408-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-tegra-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Stephen Warren Cc: Olof Johansson , linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, Stephen Warren List-Id: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org On Monday 01 April 2013, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 03/30/2013 08:13 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Saturday 30 March 2013, Stephen Warren wrote: > > If not, we can probably take your patch for now, if you remove it > > again for 3.11. > > There are at least a couple of different things in this file: > > a) The reset API, which definitely should be converted to the new reset > API. I can't make any promises about which kernel release that will > happen in, but it's definitely something we know we have to do. > > b) Power-gating. This should probably be converted to use the > powerdomains code. I believe Joseph Lo is aware of this, but again I > can't promise any specific time-scale at this time. > > So is this still OK, without any promises of timescale? > Yes, sounds good. Arnd From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann) Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2013 17:14:50 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: tegra: move to In-Reply-To: <5159B0FF.2010408@wwwdotorg.org> References: <1364602790-10759-1-git-send-email-swarren@wwwdotorg.org> <201303301413.26549.arnd@arndb.de> <5159B0FF.2010408@wwwdotorg.org> Message-ID: <201304011714.50703.arnd@arndb.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Monday 01 April 2013, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 03/30/2013 08:13 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Saturday 30 March 2013, Stephen Warren wrote: > > If not, we can probably take your patch for now, if you remove it > > again for 3.11. > > There are at least a couple of different things in this file: > > a) The reset API, which definitely should be converted to the new reset > API. I can't make any promises about which kernel release that will > happen in, but it's definitely something we know we have to do. > > b) Power-gating. This should probably be converted to use the > powerdomains code. I believe Joseph Lo is aware of this, but again I > can't promise any specific time-scale at this time. > > So is this still OK, without any promises of timescale? > Yes, sounds good. Arnd