From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>,
Sebastian Gottschall <s.gottschall@dd-wrt.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"# 3.4.x" <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Build breakage in 3.8.4 [was: Linux 3.8.4]
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2013 16:47:26 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130401234726.GA25060@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1364362994.3520.54.camel@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk>
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 05:43:14AM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-03-26 at 09:18 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 08:56:20AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > > On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 12:31 PM, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz> wrote:
> > > > On 03/20/2013 11:25 PM, Sebastian Gottschall wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Am 20.03.2013 21:15, schrieb Greg KH:
> > > >>> I'm announcing the release of the 3.8.4 kernel.
> > > > ...
> > > >>> signal: always clear sa_restorer on execve
> > > >> consider that this kernel is not compileable on mips targets due the
> > > >> patch in kernel/signal.c
> > > >>
> > > >> SA_RESTORER is defined in mips, but sa_restorer does not exist on that
> > > >> platform
> > > >
> > > > The same for ia64...
> > > >
> > > > kernel/signal.c: In function 'flush_signal_handlers':
> > > > kernel/signal.c:441: error: 'struct sigaction' has no member named
> > > > 'sa_restorer'
> > > >
> > > > Do we need this in 3.0, 3.4, 3.8 too?
> > > > commit 522cff142d7d2f9230839c9e1f21a4d8bcc22a4a
> > > > Author: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> > > > Date: Wed Mar 13 14:59:34 2013 -0700
> > > >
> > > > kernel/signal.c: use __ARCH_HAS_SA_RESTORER instead of SA_RESTORER
> > > >
> > > > __ARCH_HAS_SA_RESTORER is the preferred conditional for use in 3.9 and
> > > > later kernels, per Kees.
> > >
> > > Hrm, if so, we'll need to also backport the changes that aded
> > > __ARCH_HAS_SA_RESTORER...
> >
> > Ok, well, can someone provide me the needed patches? Otherwise I will
> > have to revert the offending change from the stable releases.
>
> For the third time... use the attached patch followed by Andrew's commit
> 522cff142d7d2f9230839c9e1f21a4d8bcc22a4a.
Sorry for being thick, you are right, now applied, thanks.
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-01 23:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-20 20:15 Linux 3.8.4 Greg KH
2013-03-20 20:16 ` Greg KH
2013-03-20 22:25 ` Sebastian Gottschall
2013-03-20 22:25 ` Sebastian Gottschall
2013-03-24 19:31 ` Build breakage in 3.8.4 [was: Linux 3.8.4] Jiri Slaby
2013-03-26 15:56 ` Kees Cook
2013-03-26 16:18 ` Greg KH
2013-03-27 5:43 ` Ben Hutchings
2013-04-01 23:47 ` Greg KH [this message]
2013-03-26 16:35 ` Luis Henriques
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130401234726.GA25060@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ben@decadent.org.uk \
--cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=s.gottschall@dd-wrt.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.