From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
To: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>, Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] sched: don't consider upper se in sched_slice()
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2013 11:25:56 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130402022556.GD16699@lge.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5159320C.4050903@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Hello, Preeti.
On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 12:36:52PM +0530, Preeti U Murthy wrote:
> Hi Joonsoo,
>
> On 04/01/2013 09:38 AM, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> > Hello, Preeti.
> >
>
> >>
> >> Ideally the children's cpu share must add upto the parent's share.
> >>
> >
> > I don't think so.
> >
> > We should schedule out the parent tg if 5ms is over. As we do so, we can
> > fairly distribute time slice to every tg within short term. If we add
> > the children's cpu share upto the parent's, the parent tg may have
> > large time slice, so it cannot be preempted easily. There may be a latency
> > problem if there are many tgs.
>
> In the case where the #running < sched_nr_latency, the children's
> sched_slices add up to the parent's.
>
> A rq with two tgs,each with 3 tasks.
>
> Each of these tasks have a sched slice of
> [(sysctl_sched_latency / 3) / 2] as of the present implementation.
>
> The sum of the above sched_slice of all tasks of a tg will lead to the
> sched_slice of its parent: sysctl_sched_latency / 2
>
> This breaks when the nr_running on each tg > sched_nr_latency. However I
> don't know if this is a good thing or a bad thing.
Ah.. Now I get your point. Yes, you are right and it may be good thing.
With that property, all tasks in the system can be scheduled at least once
in sysctl_sched_latency. sysctl_sched_latency is system-wide configuration,
so my patch may be wrong. With my patch, all tasks in the system cannot be
scheduled at least once in sysctl_sched_latency. Instead, it schedule
all tasks in cfs_rq at least once in sysctl_sched_latency if there is
no other tgs.
I think that it is real problem that sysctl_sched_min_granularity is not
guaranteed for each task.
Instead of this patch, how about considering low bound?
if (slice < sysctl_sched_min_granularity)
slice = sysctl_sched_min_granularity;
Thanks.
>
> Regards
> Preeti U Murthy
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-02 2:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-28 7:58 [PATCH 0/5] optimization, clean-up, correctness about fair.c Joonsoo Kim
2013-03-28 7:58 ` [PATCH 1/5] sched: remove one division operation in find_buiest_queue() Joonsoo Kim
2013-03-28 7:58 ` [PATCH 2/5] sched: factor out code to should_we_balance() Joonsoo Kim
2013-03-29 11:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-04-01 5:10 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-03-29 11:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-04-01 5:16 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-04-02 8:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-04-02 9:50 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-04-02 10:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-04-02 10:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-04-04 0:55 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-03-28 7:58 ` [PATCH 3/5] sched: clean-up struct sd_lb_stat Joonsoo Kim
2013-03-28 7:58 ` [PATCH 4/5] sched: don't consider upper se in sched_slice() Joonsoo Kim
2013-03-29 7:12 ` Preeti U Murthy
2013-04-01 4:08 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-04-01 7:06 ` Preeti U Murthy
2013-04-02 2:25 ` Joonsoo Kim [this message]
2013-04-02 2:35 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-04-02 9:35 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-04-02 4:55 ` Preeti U Murthy
2013-04-02 9:26 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-04-02 17:32 ` Preeti U Murthy
2013-04-04 0:42 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-04-04 6:48 ` Preeti U Murthy
2013-04-05 2:06 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-03-28 7:58 ` [PATCH 5/5] sched: limit sched_slice if it is more than sysctl_sched_latency Joonsoo Kim
2013-03-29 11:35 ` Preeti U Murthy
2013-04-01 5:09 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-04-01 6:45 ` Preeti U Murthy
2013-04-02 2:02 ` Joonsoo Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130402022556.GD16699@lge.com \
--to=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=alex.shi@intel.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.