From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the vfs tree
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 02:14:30 +0100
Message-ID: <20130403011430.GL21522@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
References: <20130403112235.0ec96e6e03389a791ad6b959@canb.auug.org.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:42795 "EHLO
	ZenIV.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1758164Ab3DCBOb (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-next@vger.kernel.org>); Tue, 2 Apr 2013 21:14:31 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20130403112235.0ec96e6e03389a791ad6b959@canb.auug.org.au>
Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-next.vger.kernel.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 11:22:35AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> And many, many more.
> 
> Caused by commit 1f4fbcb8700c ("create_proc_cpu_mask() doesn't need an
> argument...").  Please build test this stuff *before* publishing it.  :-(

"Remember to push the fixes", actually ;-/